ArticleBMC health services research2020
Experiences of using the i-PARIHS framework: a co-designed case study of four multi-site implementation projects.
Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05853289 (Piloting a Web-Based Implementation Resource for Pregnancy Opioid Use Disorder Care in Jail), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Piloting a Web-Based Implementation Resource for Pregnancy Opioid Use Disorder Care in Jail
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Toward a Learning Health Care System: A Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Conceptual Framework for Implementation of Clinical Analytics in a Digital Hospital.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Pooled it
- Evaluating a virtual facilitation workshop with antimicrobial stewardship teams within a cluster randomized stepped-wedge trial.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- Long-term use of an ankle-foot orthosis intervention in patients with peripheral artery disease using the integrated promoting action on research implementation in health services (i-PARIHS) framework.International journal of cardiology · 2023Trial
- How is leadership behavior associated with organization-related variables? Translation and psychometric evaluation of the implementation leadership scale in German primary healthcare.BMC health services research · 2022Trial
- Multicultural Implementation-Experiences of Peer Support Workers in MH Services: Qualitative Findings of UPSIDES Innovative Intervention-An International Multi-Site Project.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Article
- Enablers and Barriers to the Implementation of the Allied Health Rural Generalist Education and Training Scheme in Rural and Remote Private and Non-Government Contexts in Australia.The Australian journal of rural health · 2026Article
- Perspectives and Experiences of Nurses Implementing the Safe Steps for De-Escalation in Acute Mental Health Units.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Investing in Infrastructure: A Mixed-Methods Cost Analysis of Implementation Strategies to Address Emerging Youth Drug Trends.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs · 2026Article
- Moving from change agents to improvement architects through the Four Cs model: rethinking healthcare's complexity, cultures, contexts and connections.Frontiers in health services · 2026Review
- Use of the i-PARIHS framework in nutrition and dietetics research and practice: A citation analysis of the literature and case studies.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025Review
- Is this to be another project that fizzles out? Using the i-PARIHS framework to evaluate implementation of a mentoring programme.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Test Smart, Treat Smart-using clinician feedback to adapt a catheter-associated urinary tract infection intervention for spinal cord injury.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Site engagement in implementation research: Introducing SEAMLIS as a conceptual and measurement framework.Health & justice · 2025Article
- Transforming dementia research into practice: a multiple case study of academic research utilization strategies in Dutch Alzheimer Centres.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Internal Communication and Dissemination Strategies During Magnet Implementation in German Hospitals: A Qualitative Study.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
- Quality improvement lessons learned from National Implementation of the "Patient Safety Events in Community Care: Reporting, Investigation, and Improvement Guidebook".Health services research · 2024Article
- Advancing sexual assault prevention through implementation science.Psychology of violence · 2024Article
- Implementation of a rural emergency department-initiated buprenorphine program in the mountain west: a study protocol.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2024Article
- Building a sharable literature collection to advance the science and practice of implementation facilitation.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework is an implementation framework that has been developed and refined over the last 20 years. Its underlying philosophy is that implementing research into healthcare practice is complex, unpredictable and non-linear which therefore requires a flexible and responsive approach to implementation. Facilitation is recognized as the central ingredient of this approach, and i-PARIHS now provides a Facilitation Guide with associated tools. This multiple case study of four implementation projects explored how the i-PARIHS framework has been practically operationalized by diverse implementation project teams.
methodsA co-design approach was used to elicit the experiences of four implementation project teams who used the i-PARIHS framework to guide their implementation approach. We conducted the established co-design steps of (i) setting up for success, (ii) gathering the experience, and (iii) understanding the experience. In particular we explored teams' approaches to setting up their projects; why and how they used the i-PARIHS framework and what they learnt from the experience.
resultsWe found both commonalities and differences in the use of i-PARIHS across the four implementation projects: (i) all the projects used the Facilitation Checklist that accompanies i-PARIHS as a starting point, (ii) the projects differed in how facilitation was carried out, (iii) existing tools were adapted for distinct phases: pre-implementation, during implementation, and post-implementation stages; and (iv) project-specific tools were often developed for monitoring implementation activities and fidelity.
conclusionsWe have provided a detailed overview of how current users of i-PARIHS are operationalising the framework, which existing tools they are using or adapting to use, and where they have needed to develop new tools to best utilise the framework. Importantly, this study highlights the value of existing tools from the published i-PARIHS Facilitation Guide and provides a starting point to further refine and add to these tools within a future Mobilising Implementation of i-PARIHS (or "Mi-PARIHS") suite of resources. Specifically, Mi-PARIHS might include more explicit guidance and/or tools for developing a structured implementation plan and monitoring fidelity to the implementation plan, including recording how strategies are tailored to an evolving context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.