Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32576197›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Experiences of using the i-PARIHS framework: a co-designed case study of four multi-site implementation projects.

S C Hunter, B Kim, A Mudge, L Hall, A Young, P McRae, A L Kitson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05853289 (Piloting a Web-Based Implementation Resource for Pregnancy Opioid Use Disorder Care in Jail), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05853289 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Piloting a Web-Based Implementation Resource for Pregnancy Opioid Use Disorder Care in Jail

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled22ConditionsOpioid Use DisorderArmsMaternal Opioid use Disorder Management and Care Resources (MOM CARE) in Custody
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. BMJ open · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Use of the i-PARIHS framework in nutrition and dietetics research and practice: A citation analysis of the literature and case studies.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S C HunterCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia. sarah.hunter@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3407-0774
B KimCentre for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston, USA.
A MudgeInternal Medicine Research Unit, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
L HallSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
A YoungNutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, QLD, Brisbane, Australia.
P McRaeInternal Medicine Research Unit, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
A L KitsonCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework is an implementation framework that has been developed and refined over the last 20 years. Its underlying philosophy is that implementing research into healthcare practice is complex, unpredictable and non-linear which therefore requires a flexible and responsive approach to implementation. Facilitation is recognized as the central ingredient of this approach, and i-PARIHS now provides a Facilitation Guide with associated tools. This multiple case study of four implementation projects explored how the i-PARIHS framework has been practically operationalized by diverse implementation project teams.

methodsA co-design approach was used to elicit the experiences of four implementation project teams who used the i-PARIHS framework to guide their implementation approach. We conducted the established co-design steps of (i) setting up for success, (ii) gathering the experience, and (iii) understanding the experience. In particular we explored teams' approaches to setting up their projects; why and how they used the i-PARIHS framework and what they learnt from the experience.

resultsWe found both commonalities and differences in the use of i-PARIHS across the four implementation projects: (i) all the projects used the Facilitation Checklist that accompanies i-PARIHS as a starting point, (ii) the projects differed in how facilitation was carried out, (iii) existing tools were adapted for distinct phases: pre-implementation, during implementation, and post-implementation stages; and (iv) project-specific tools were often developed for monitoring implementation activities and fidelity.

conclusionsWe have provided a detailed overview of how current users of i-PARIHS are operationalising the framework, which existing tools they are using or adapting to use, and where they have needed to develop new tools to best utilise the framework. Importantly, this study highlights the value of existing tools from the published i-PARIHS Facilitation Guide and provides a starting point to further refine and add to these tools within a future Mobilising Implementation of i-PARIHS (or "Mi-PARIHS") suite of resources. Specifically, Mi-PARIHS might include more explicit guidance and/or tools for developing a structured implementation plan and monitoring fidelity to the implementation plan, including recording how strategies are tailored to an evolving context.

Indexed as

Models, OrganizationalDelivery of Health CareHealth Services ResearchHumansOrganizational Case StudiesCo-designImplementation frameworksImplementation scienceI-PARIHSKnowledge translation

Identifiers

PMID32576197
PMCPMC7310499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.