Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32576194›Full record

SynthesisBMC medicine2020

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing mortality in restrictive and liberal haemoglobin thresholds for red cell transfusion: an overview of systematic reviews.

Kevin M Trentino, Shannon L Farmer, Michael F Leahy, Frank M Sanfilippo, James P Isbister, Rhonda Mayberry, Axel Hofmann, Aryeh Shander, Craig French, Kevin Murray

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Perioperative Blood Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Restrictive versus liberal transfusion thresholds: lights and shadows.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Limits of Acute Anemia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  14. [Optimal oxygen administration-new evidence from treating COVID-19?]Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2022
    Review
  15. Acute Upper Non-variceal and Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Review
  16. Emergency Blood Transfusion for Trauma and Perioperative Resuscitation: Standard of Care.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. RBC Transfusion Triggers: Is There Anything New?Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kevin M TrentinoSchool of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. Kevin.Trentino@uwa.edu.au.
Shannon L FarmerMedical School and Division of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Michael F LeahyDepartment of Haematology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Frank M SanfilippoSchool of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
James P IsbisterSchool of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Rhonda MayberryLibrary and Information Service, South Metropolitan Health Service, Murdoch, Australia.
Axel HofmannSchool of Health Sciences and Graduate Studies, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.
Aryeh ShanderDepartment of Anesthesiology, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, TeamHealth Research Institute New Jersey, Englewood, USA.
Craig FrenchAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Kevin MurraySchool of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are no overviews of systematic reviews investigating haemoglobin thresholds for transfusion. This is important as the literature on transfusion thresholds has grown considerably in recent years. Our aim was to synthesise evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the effects of restrictive and liberal transfusion strategies on mortality.

methodsThis was a systematic review of systematic reviews (overview). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Joanna Briggs Institute EBP Database, from 2008 to 2018. We included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials comparing mortality in patients assigned to red cell transfusion strategies based on haemoglobin thresholds. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed methodological quality. We assessed the methodological quality of included reviews using AMSTAR 2 and the quality of evidence pooled using an algorithm to assign GRADE levels.

resultsWe included 19 systematic reviews reporting 33 meta-analyses of mortality outcomes from 53 unique randomised controlled trials. Of the 33 meta-analyses, one was graded as high quality, 15 were moderate, and 17 were low. Of the meta-analyses presenting high- to moderate-quality evidence, 12 (75.0%) reported no statistically significant difference in mortality between restrictive and liberal transfusion groups and four (25.0%) reported significantly lower mortality for patients assigned to a restrictive transfusion strategy. We found few systematic reviews addressed clinical differences between included studies: variation was observed in haemoglobin threshold concentrations, the absolute between group difference in haemoglobin threshold concentration, time to randomisation (resulting in transfusions administered prior to randomisation), and transfusion dosing regimens.

conclusionsMeta-analyses graded as high to moderate quality indicate that in most patient populations no difference in mortality exists between patients assigned to a restrictive or liberal transfusion strategy.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42019120503.

Indexed as

Erythrocyte TransfusionHemoglobinsHumansMortalityHemoglobinsAnaemiaOverviewRed cell transfusionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32576194
PMCPMC7313211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.