Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32576176›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Ex vivo modelling of drug efficacy in a rare metastatic urachal carcinoma.

Rami Mäkelä, Antti Arjonen, Ville Härmä, Nina Rintanen, Lauri Paasonen, Tobias Paprotka, Kerstin Rönsch, Teijo Kuopio, Juha Kononen, Juha K Rantala

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Precision Oncology Approach for Urachal Carcinoma: A Clinical Case Report.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Oncotarget · 2021
    Article
  8. Frontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rami MäkeläMisvik Biology Ltd, Karjakatu 35 B, FI-20520, Turku, Finland.
Antti ArjonenMisvik Biology Ltd, Karjakatu 35 B, FI-20520, Turku, Finland.
Ville HärmäMisvik Biology Ltd, Karjakatu 35 B, FI-20520, Turku, Finland.
Nina RintanenCentral Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Lauri PaasonenUPM-Kymmene Corporation, Helsinki, Finland.
Tobias PaprotkaEurofins Genomics Europe Sequencing GmbH, Constance, Germany.
Kerstin RönschEurofins Genomics Europe Sequencing GmbH, Constance, Germany.
Teijo KuopioCentral Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Juha KononenCentral Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Juha K RantalaMisvik Biology Ltd, Karjakatu 35 B, FI-20520, Turku, Finland. rantala@misvik.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4999-5585
Central Finland Health Care District · FIEurofins (Germany) · DETurku Centre for Computer Science · FIUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

AstraZeneca 18122013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEx vivo drug screening refers to the out-of-body assessment of drug efficacy in patient derived vital tumor cells. The purpose of these methods is to enable functional testing of patient specific efficacy of anti-cancer therapeutics and personalized treatment strategies. Such approaches could prove powerful especially in context of rare cancers for which demonstration of novel therapies is difficult due to the low numbers of patients. Here, we report comparison of different ex vivo drug screening methods in a metastatic urachal adenocarcinoma, a rare and aggressive non-urothelial bladder malignancy that arises from the remnant embryologic urachus in adults.

methodsTo compare the feasibility and results obtained with alternative ex vivo drug screening techniques, we used three different approaches; enzymatic cell viability assay of 2D cell cultures and image-based cytometry of 2D and 3D cell cultures in parallel. Vital tumor cells isolated from a biopsy obtained in context of a surgical debulking procedure were used for screening of 1160 drugs with the aim to evaluate patterns of efficacy in the urachal cancer cells.

resultsDose response data from the enzymatic cell viability assay and the image-based assay of 2D cell cultures showed the best consistency. With 3D cell culture conditions, the proliferation rate of the tumor cells was slower and potency of several drugs was reduced even following growth rate normalization of the responses. MEK, mTOR, and MET inhibitors were identified as the most cytotoxic targeted drugs. Secondary validation analyses confirmed the efficacy of these drugs also with the new human urachal adenocarcinoma cell line (MISB18) established from the patient's tumor.

conclusionsAll the tested ex vivo drug screening methods captured the patient's tumor cells' sensitivity to drugs that could be associated with the oncogenic KRAS

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCystectomyDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorEnzyme AssaysFeasibility StudiesHumansMaleMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesMutationPrecision MedicineAntineoplastic AgentsKRAS protein, humanMET protein, humanMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesMTOR protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)TOR Serine-Threonine KinasesEx vivo drug screeningPrecision medicineRare cancerUrachal carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID32576176
PMCPMC7313172
OpenAlexW3036650948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.