Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32576163›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

Minimal important differences for the WOMAC osteoarthritis index and the Forgotten Joint Score-12 in total knee arthroplasty patients.

N Holtz, D F Hamilton, J M Giesinger, B Jost, K Giesinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Comparative outcomes of total knee arthroplasty in patients with posttraumatic versus primary knee osteoarthritis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparable clinical outcomes in functionally aligned computer-assisted and image-based robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

N HoltzDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacher Strasse 95, CH-9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
D F HamiltonDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
J M GiesingerInnsbruck Institute of Patient-Centered Outcome Research (IIPCOR), Innsbruck, Austria.
B JostDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacher Strasse 95, CH-9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
K GiesingerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacher Strasse 95, CH-9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland. karlmeinrad.giesinger@kssg.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis. Patient reported-outcome measures (PROMs) capture the patients' perception of the success of an intervention. The minimal important difference (MID) is an important characteristic of the PROM, which helps to interpret results. The aim of this study was to identify the MID for the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index.

methodsData were collected in a prospective cohort study. Patients were asked to complete the FJS-12, WOMAC osteoarthritis index and transition items evaluating change over time to determine the MID. We employed an anchor-based methodology relating score change to the response categories of the transition items using both binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

resultsData from 199 patients were analysed. Mean age was 72.3 years, 58% were women. Employing binary logistic regression the MID for the FJS-12 was 10.8 points, for the WOMAC pain score 7.5 points and for the WOMAC function score 7.2 points. ROC analyses found a MID of 13.0 points for the FJS-12, 12.5 points for WOMAC pain and 14.7 points for WOMAC function.

conclusionWe report MIDs for the FJS-12 and the WOMAC Pain and Function scales in a TKA patient cohort, which can be used to interpret meaningful differences in score. In line with previous research, we found more advanced statistical methods to result in smaller MID estimates for both scores.

trial registrationWritten consent for this study was obtained from all participants and ethical approval was granted by the local ethics committee (Ethikkommission St. Gallen; EKSG 14/973; Registered 03 July 2014; http://www.sg.ch/home/gesundheit/ethikkommission.html).

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeJoint ProsthesisMinimal Clinically Important DifferenceAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularROC CurveForgotten Joint Score-12Minimal important differencePatient-reported outcomesTotal knee arthroplastyWestern Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis indexWOMAC

Identifiers

PMID32576163
PMCPMC7313217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.