Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32576153›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Do Polish primary care physicians meet the expectations of their patients? An analysis of Polish QUALICOPC data.

Anna Krztoń-Królewiecka, Marek Oleszczyk, Adam Windak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction with Healthcare Services in Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna Krztoń-KrólewieckaDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 4 Bochenska Street, 31-061, Krakow, Poland. akrolewiecka@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8492-8361
Marek OleszczykDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 4 Bochenska Street, 31-061, Krakow, Poland.
Adam WindakDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 4 Bochenska Street, 31-061, Krakow, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) grant agreement 242141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeeting the expectations of patients is one of the most crucial criteria when assessing the quality of a healthcare system. This study aimed to compare the expectations and experiences of patients of primary care in Poland and to identify key patient characteristics affecting these outlooks.

methodsThe study was performed within the framework of the international Quality and Costs of Primary Care in Europe (QUALICOPC) cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study. In Poland, a nationally representative sample of 2218 patients were recruited to take part in the study. As a study tool, we used data from two of four QUALICOPC questionnaires: "Patient Experience" and "Patient Values".

resultsPatients' expectations were fulfilled in all study areas: accessibility, continuity, quality of care, and equity. We observed that the highest-met expectations indexes were in the area of quality of care, while the lowest, but still with a positive value, were in the area of accessibility. Patient-doctor communication was the aspect most valued by study participants. Elements of the patient's own level of engagement during the consultation were ranked as less essential.

conclusionsComparing patient experiences to their values allows us to identify areas for improvement that are prioritized by patients. Accessibility is recognized as the most important area by Polish patients, simultaneously showing the highest level of patient-perceived improvement potential. Interpersonal care is another domain, in which the needs of patients are satisfied but are also relatively high. Strong clinician-patient relationships seem to be a priority in patients' expectations. The continuous efforts in interpersonal communication skills training for primary care physicians should be upgraded.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsPhysicians, Primary CareAdultContinuity of Patient CareCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleNeeds AssessmentPatient Outcome AssessmentPatient ParticipationPatient PreferencePolandPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth services researchPatient satisfactionPrimary care, general practiceQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID32576153
PMCPMC7313208
OpenAlexW3036865959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.