Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32575894›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Multimodal Emotion Evaluation: A Physiological Model for Cost-Effective Emotion Classification.

Gisela Pinto, João M Carvalho, Filipa Barros, Sandra C Soares, Armando J Pinho, Susana Brás

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Emotional recognition technologies applied to health: review and challenges.Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gisela PintoDepartment of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
João M CarvalhoDepartment of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9829-7804
Filipa BarrosDepartment of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Sandra C SoaresDepartment of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Armando J PinhoDepartment of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9164-0016
Susana BrásDepartment of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8650-9219

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/118244/2016Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/136815/2018Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/00127/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/04810/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/IC/4255/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotional responses are associated with distinct body alterations and are crucial to foster adaptive responses, well-being, and survival. Emotion identification may improve peoples' emotion regulation strategies and interaction with multiple life contexts. Several studies have investigated emotion classification systems, but most of them are based on the analysis of only one, a few, or isolated physiological signals. Understanding how informative the individual signals are and how their combination works would allow to develop more cost-effective, informative, and objective systems for emotion detection, processing, and interpretation. In the present work, electrocardiogram, electromyogram, and electrodermal activity were processed in order to find a physiological model of emotions. Both a unimodal and a multimodal approach were used to analyze what signal, or combination of signals, may better describe an emotional response, using a sample of 55 healthy subjects. The method was divided in: (1) signal preprocessing; (2) feature extraction; (3) classification using random forest and neural networks. Results suggest that the electrocardiogram (ECG) signal is the most effective for emotion classification. Yet, the combination of all signals provides the best emotion identification performance, with all signals providing crucial information for the system. This physiological model of emotions has important research and clinical implications, by providing valuable information about the value and weight of physiological signals for emotional classification, which can critically drive effective evaluation, monitoring and intervention, regarding emotional processing and regulation, considering multiple contexts.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeural Networks, ComputerCost-Benefit AnalysisElectrocardiographyElectromyographyEmotionsHumansaffective computingfeature extractionmultimodalneural networkrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID32575894
PMCPMC7349550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.