Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32575879›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Who or What Influences the Individuals' Decision-Making Process Regarding Vaccinations?

Hanna Czajka, Szymon Czajka, Paweł Biłas, Paulina Pałka, Szczepan Jędrusik, Anna Czapkiewicz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hanna CzajkaFaculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszów, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland.
Szymon CzajkaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-752 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8942-6371
Paweł BiłasStudent's Scientific Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszów, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland.
Paulina PałkaStudent's Scientific Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszów, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland.
Szczepan JędrusikStudent's Scientific Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszów, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland.
Anna CzapkiewiczFaculty of Management, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-067 Kraków, Poland.
University of Rzeszów · PLAGH University of Krakow · PLMedical University of Silesia · PLUniwersytecki Szpital Dziecięcy · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thanks to vaccines, many people are not exposed to the risks associated with vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). This, however, results in growing popularity of antivaccine movements and affects global and local epidemiological situation. Vaccine hesitancy has become a significant problem not only for epidemiologists but also for practitioners. Fortunately, the hesitant group seems to be vulnerable to intervention, and studies indicate that these patients can be persuaded to undergo vaccinations. The aim of the present study was to determine the factors most strongly affecting vaccination-related attitudes and decisions. An anonymous, self-administered survey consisting of demographic data and single select multiple-choice questions regarding vaccination was conducted. The voluntary study included secondary school pupils, medical and nonmedical students, healthcare professionals, hospital and clinic patients as well as parents. A total of 7950 survey forms were distributed between January 2018 and June 2019 in south-eastern Poland. A total of 6432 respondents (80.2%) completed a questionnaire that was eligible for analysis. The positive attitude toward vaccination was significantly affected by older age, by the fact of obtaining information on vaccinations from a physician, this information's higher quality (assessed in school grade scale), higher level of knowledge on vaccines and by the fact of denying the association between vaccination and autism in children (

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeVaccinationFemaleHumansMalePolandSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinesVaccinesantivaccine movementsmedical educationvaccinationvaccine hesitancyvaccine-preventable diseases

Identifiers

PMID32575879
PMCPMC7344516
OpenAlexW3036724509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.