Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32575821›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Results of a Phase I-II Study on Laser Therapy for Vaginal Side Effects after Radiotherapy for Cancer of Uterine Cervix or Endometrium.

Anna Myriam Perrone, Marco Tesei, Martina Ferioli, Francesca De Terlizzi, Anna Nunzia Della Gatta, Safia Boussedra, Giulia Dondi, Andrea Galuppi, Alessio Giuseppe Morganti, Pierandrea De Iaco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Let's talk about sex: consensus guidelines of the GINECOR working group of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology: clinical recommendations after pelvic radiotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Safety and efficacy of non-ablative COArchives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Fractional COBMC women's health · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Myriam PerroneGynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3140-4772
Marco TeseiGynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Martina FerioliRadiotherapy Unit, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Francesca De TerlizziScientific & Medical Department, IGEA S.p.A., Via Parmenide 10/A, 41012 Carpi (Mo), Italy.
Anna Nunzia Della GattaGynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0367-5276
Safia BoussedraGynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Giulia DondiGynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Andrea GaluppiCentro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Alessio Giuseppe MorgantiCentro di Studio e Ricerca delle Neoplasie Ginecologiche (CSR), University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Pierandrea De IacoGynecologic Oncology Unit, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITIGEA Clinical Biophysics (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women who have previously received radiotherapy (RT) for gynecologic cancer often suffer from vaginal fibrosis and stenosis. The success of "non-ablative" laser therapy for postmenopausal vaginal atrophy has led to the idea of testing the laser in patients submitted to RT. In this prospective observational study, we selected patients who underwent pelvic RT followed by vaginal laser treatment. We scheduled three treatment sessions (at T0-T1-T2) and three controls (at T1-T2-T3) one month apart. The follow-up (at T4) was carried out six months after the last treatment. Vaginal Health Index (VHI) and vaginal length were evaluated. Sexual function was assessed through Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Overall, 43 patients with severe vaginal shortening, atrophy and stenosis was enrolled and treated with intravaginal non-ablative CO

Indexed as

brachytherapycervical cancerendometrial cancerlaser therapyradiotherapysexual functionvaginal fibrosis

Identifiers

PMID32575821
PMCPMC7352893
OpenAlexW3036935435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.