ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Prediction of Body Weight of a Person Lying on a Smart Mat in Nonrestraint and Unconsciousness Conditions.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Design and development of an IoT-based trolley for weighing the patient in lying condition.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We want to predict body weight while lying in bed for an elderly patient who is unable to move by himself/herself. To this end, we have implemented a prototype system that estimates the body weight of a person lying on a smart mat in nonrestraint and unconsciousness conditions. A total of 128 FSR (force sensing resistor) sensors were placed in a 16 × 8-grid structure on the smart mat. We formulated three methods based on the features to be applied: segmentation, average cumulative sum of pressure, and serialization. All the proposed methods were implemented with four different machine-learning models: regression, deep neural network (DNN), convolutional neural network (CNN), and random forest. We compared their performance using MAE and RMSE as evaluation criteria. From the experimental results, we chose the serialization method with the DNN model as the best model. Despite the limitations of the presence of dead space due to the wide spacing between the sensors and the small dataset, the MAE and the RMSE of the body weight prediction of the proposed method was 4.608 and 5.796, respectively. That is, it showed an average error of ±4.6 kg for the average weight of 72.9 kg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.