ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Implementation and Optimization of a Dual-confocal Autofocusing System.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovative Image Processing Method to Improve Autofocusing Accuracy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This paper describes the implementation and optimization of a dual-confocal autofocusing system that can easily describe a real-time position by measuring the response signal (i.e., intensity) of the front and the rear focal points of the system. This is a new and systematic design strategy that would make it possible to use this system for other applications while retrieving their characteristic curves experimentally; there is even a good chance of this technique becoming the gold standard for optimizing these dual-confocal configurations. We adopt two indexes to predict our system performance and discover that the rear focal position and its physical design are major factors. A laboratory-built prototype was constructed and demonstrated to ensure that its optimization was valid. The experimental results showed that a total optical difference from 150 to 400 mm significantly affected the effective volume of our designed autofocusing system. The results also showed that the sensitivity of the dual-confocal autofocusing system is affected more by the position of the rear focal point than the position of the front focal point. The final optimizing setup indicated that the rear focal length and the front focal length should be set at 200 and 100 mm, respectively. In addition, the characteristic curve between the focus error signal and its position could successfully define the exact position by a polynomial equation of the sixth order, meaning that the system can be straightforwardly applied to an accurate micro-optical auto-focusing system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.