Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32575467›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Evaluation of Physiological Parameters of Intestinal Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Isolated from Patients Suffering from IBD and Healthy People.

Ivan Kushkevych, Jorge Castro Sangrador, Dani Dordević, Monika Rozehnalová, Martin Černý, Roman Fafula, Monika Vítězová, Simon K-M R Rittmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Ivan KushkevychDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8450-7137
Jorge Castro SangradorDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Dani DordevićDepartment of Plant Origin Foodstuffs Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 61242 Brno, Czech Republic.
Monika RozehnalováCentre of Region Hana for Biotechnological an Agricultural Research, Central Laboratories and Research Support, Faculty of Science, Palacky University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Martin ČernýDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8231-9634
Roman FafulaDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, 69 Pekarska St., 79010 Lviv, Ukraine.
Monika VítězováDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Simon K-M R RittmannArchaea Physiology & Biotechnology Group, Department of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Universität Wien, Althanstraße 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9746-3284
Masaryk University · CZDanylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University · UAPalacký University Olomouc · CZUniversidad de Salamanca · ESUniversity of Veterinary Sciences Brno · CZUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

Grant Agency of the Masaryk University MUNI/A/0947/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are multifactorial illnesses of the intestine, to which microorganisms are contributing. Among the contributing microorganisms, sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are suggested to be involved in the process of bowel inflammation due to the production of hydrogen sulfide (H

methodsMicroscopic techniques, microbiological, biochemical, biophysical methods and statistical analysis were included.

resultsColonies of SRB were isolated from all the fecal samples, and subsequently, 35 strains were obtained. Vibrio-shaped cells stained Gram-negative were dominant in all purified studied strains. All strains had a high percentage of similarity by the 16S rRNA gene with deposited sequences in GenBank of

conclusionsThe observations obtained from studying SRB emphasize differences in the intestinal microbial processes of healthy and unhealthy people.

Indexed as

bowel diseasehydrogen sulfideintestinal microbiotasulfate reductiontoxicityulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID32575467
PMCPMC7357025
OpenAlexW3036319096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.