Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32575363›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Assessing Antibiotic Residues in Poultry Eggs from Backyard Production Systems in Chile, First Approach to a Non-Addressed Issue in Farm Animals.

Javiera Cornejo, Ekaterina Pokrant, Francisco Figueroa, Ricardo Riquelme, Pablo Galdames, Francisca Di Pillo, Pedro Jimenez-Bluhm, Christopher Hamilton-West

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Epidemiological Characterization of Isolates ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Risk factors associated withVeterinary world · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Risk Factors for Positivity to Shiga Toxin-ProducingInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. ESBL-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Varying combinations ofTranslational animal science · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Javiera CornejoFood Safety Laboratory, Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8820808, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-5641-9562
Ekaterina PokrantFood Safety Laboratory, Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8820808, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-1562-955X
Francisco FigueroaFood Safety Laboratory, Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8820808, Chile.
Ricardo RiquelmeFood Safety Laboratory, Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8820808, Chile.
Pablo GaldamesEpidemiology Unit, Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8820808, Chile.
Francisca Di PilloNucleo de Investigaciones Aplicadas en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Agronomía, Universidad de Las Américas, Sede Providencia, Manuel Montt 948, Santiago 7500972, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6662-0323
Pedro Jimenez-BluhmEpidemiology Unit, Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8820808, Chile.
Christopher Hamilton-WestEpidemiology Unit, Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8820808, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-5609-2237
University of Chile · CLUniversity of the Americas · CL

Funding

Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico 1191747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eggs are the main product generated from backyard poultry production systems (BPS) because they can quickly be consumed and sold to meet essential family needs. Nevertheless, antimicrobial residues can accumulate in this product. The objective of this study was to evaluate the presence of antimicrobial residues in eggs produced by poultry kept in BPS in central Chile. To assess this, eggs were obtained from 83 BPS and analysed to evaluate the presence of antibiotic residues (families: tetracyclines, beta-lactams, aminoglycosides and macrolides), using a Four-Plate Test screening method for the detection, based on a bacterial growth inhibition method. Results show a lack of biosecurity procedures at BPS level, making these systems susceptible to the dissemination of antimicrobial residues. These include intensive animal production units in the proximity, and the presence of shared watercourses with other farms. Furthermore, 66% of the surveyed owners are indicated as giving pharmacological treatments to their chickens. Eggs from 61 BPS were positive for at least one antimicrobial. Fifty-three BPS were positive for more than one antimicrobial, and one BPS was positive for all four antimicrobials tested. Consequently, there is a risk that poultry eggs produced in BPS in central Chile carry residues of different families of antimicrobials.

Indexed as

antimicrobialsbackyard poultryChilefood safetypoultry eggs

Identifiers

PMID32575363
PMCPMC7341250
OpenAlexW3035764758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.