Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32575160›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2020

PK/PD Mediated Dose Optimization of Emactuzumab, a CSF1R Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Diffuse-Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor.

Kevin Smart, Ann-Marie Bröske, Dominik Rüttinger, Claudia Mueller, Alex Phipps, Antje-Christine Walz, Carola Ries, Monika Baehner, Michael Cannarile, Georgina Meneses-Lorente

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical Development of Colony-Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor (CSF1R) Inhibitors.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kevin SmartRoche Innovation Center Welwyn, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Ann-Marie BröskeRoche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.
Dominik RüttingerRoche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.
Claudia MuellerRoche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.
Alex PhippsRoche Innovation Center Welwyn, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Antje-Christine WalzRoche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Carola RiesRoche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.
Monika BaehnerRoche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.
Michael CannarileRoche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.
Georgina Meneses-LorenteRoche Innovation Center Welwyn, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Roche Pharma AG (Germany) · DERoche (United Kingdom) · GBRoche (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted biological therapies may achieve maximal therapeutic efficacy at doses below the maximum tolerated dose (MTD); therefore, the search for the MTD in clinical studies may not be ideal for these agents. Emactuzumab is an investigational monoclonal antibody that binds to and inhibits the activation of the cell surface colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor. Here, we show how modeling target-mediated drug disposition coupled with pharmacodynamic end points was used to optimize the dose of emactuzumab without defining an MTD. The model could be used to recommend doses across different disease indications. The approach recommended an optimal biological dose of emactuzumab for dosing every 2 weeks (q2w) ≥ 900 mg, approximately three-fold lower than the highest dose tested clinically. The model predicted that emactuzumab doses ≥ 900 mg q2w would achieve target saturation in excess of 90% over the entire dosing cycle. Subsequently, a dose of 1,000 mg q2w was used in the extension phase of a phase I study of emactuzumab in patients with advanced solid tumors or diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor. Clinical data from this study were consistent with model predictions. The model was also used to predict the optimum dose of emactuzumab for use with dosing every 3 weeks, enabling dosing flexibility with respect to comedications. In summary, this work demonstrates the value of quantitative clinical pharmacology approaches to dose selection in oncology as opposed to traditional MTD methods.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Dosage CalculationsGiant Cell Tumor of Tendon SheathHumansModels, BiologicalMolecular Targeted TherapyReceptor, Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorReceptors, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorSignal TransductionTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCSF1R protein, humanemactuzumabReceptor, Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorReceptors, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor

Identifiers

PMID32575160
PMCPMC7589268
OpenAlexW3035840928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.