Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32574947›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)2020

Temporal and spatial analysis of per and polyfluoroalkyl substances in surface waters of Houston ship channel following a large-scale industrial fire incident.

Noor A Aly, Yu-Syuan Luo, Yina Liu, Gaston Casillas, Thomas J McDonald, James M Kaihatu, Mikyoung Jun, Nicholas Ellis, Sarah Gossett, James N Dodds and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noor A AlyInterdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA; Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Yu-Syuan LuoInterdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA; Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Yina LiuGeochemical and Environmental Research Group, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA; Department of Oceanography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Gaston CasillasInterdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Thomas J McDonaldDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
James M KaihatuZachry Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Mikyoung JunDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Nicholas EllisGalveston Bay Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
Sarah GossettGalveston Bay Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
James N DoddsDepartment of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Erin S BakerDepartment of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Sharmila BhandariInterdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA; Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Weihsueh A ChiuInterdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA; Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Ivan RusynInterdisciplinary Faculty of Toxicology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA; Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. Electronic address: irusyn@cvm.tamu.edu.
Texas A&M University · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

Single cell, multi-parametric high throughput platform to classify endocrine disruptor potential of mixturesP42ES027704 · NIEHS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI Thomas Joseph McDonald · 2017 to 2026
$21.2M
Texas A&M Center for Environmental Health Research (TiCER)P30ES029067 · NIEHS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI Weston W Porter · 2019 to 2026
$13.0M
Regulatory Science in Environmental Health and ToxicologyT32ES026568 · NIEHS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI Weihsueh A Chiu, Natalie M Johnson · 2016 to 2026
$3.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES029067NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES027704NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES026568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Firefighting foams contain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) - a class of compounds widely used as surfactants. PFAS are persistent organic pollutants that have been reported in waterways and drinking water systems across the United States. These substances are of interest to both regulatory agencies and the general public because of their persistence in the environment and association with adverse health effects. PFAS can be released in large quantities during industrial incidents because they are present in most firefighting foams used to suppress chemical fires; however, little is known about persistence of PFAS in public waterways after such events. In response to large-scale fires at Intercontinental Terminal Company (ITC) in Houston, Texas in March 2019, almost 5 million liters of class B firefighting foams were used. Much of this material flowed into the Houston Ship Channel and Galveston Bay (HSC/GB) and concerns were raised about the levels of PFAS in these water bodies that have commercial and recreational uses. To evaluate the impact of the ITC incident response on PFAS levels in HSC/GB, we collected 52 surface water samples from 12 locations over a 6-month period after the incident. Samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to evaluate 27 PFAS, including perfluorocarboxylic acids, perfluorosulfonates and fluorotelomers. Among PFAS that were evaluated, 6:2 FTS and PFOS were detected at highest concentrations. Temporal and spatial profiles of PFAS were established; we found a major peak in the level of many PFAS in the days and weeks after the incident and a gradual decline over several months with patterns consistent with the tide- and wave-associated water movements. This work documents the impact of a large-scale industrial fire, on the environmental levels of PFAS, establishes a baseline concentration of PFAS in HSC/GB, and highlights the critical need for development of PFAS water quality standards.

Indexed as

FiresDrinking WaterFluorocarbonsTexasWater Pollutants, ChemicalDrinking WaterFluorocarbonsWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID32574947
PMCPMC7857671
OpenAlexW3035240321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.