Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32574803›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Modulatory effects of dynamic fMRI-based neurofeedback on emotion regulation networks in adolescent females.

Catharina Zich, Nicola Johnstone, Michael Lührs, Stephen Lisk, Simone Pw Haller, Annalisa Lipp, Jennifer Yf Lau, Kathrin Cohen Kadosh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Genetic Vulnerability to Social Anxiety Disorder.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Regulating Road Rage.Social and personality psychology compass · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Catharina ZichDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK. Electronic address: catharina.zich@uni-oldenburg.de.
Nicola JohnstoneSchool of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Michael LührsDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6211 LK, the Netherlands; Department of Research and Development, Brain Innovation, Maastricht, 6229 EV, the Netherlands.
Stephen LiskPsychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Simone Pw HallerDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK.
Annalisa LippSchool of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
Jennifer Yf LauPsychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Kathrin Cohen KadoshDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK; School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.
University of Surrey · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBMaastricht University · NL

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research has shown that difficulties with emotion regulation abilities in childhood and adolescence increase the risk for developing symptoms of mental disorders, e.g anxiety. We investigated whether functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-based neurofeedback (NF) can modulate brain networks supporting emotion regulation abilities in adolescent females. We performed three experiments (Experiment 1: N ​= ​18; Experiment 2: N ​= ​30; Experiment 3: N ​= ​20). We first compared different NF implementations regarding their effectiveness of modulating prefrontal cortex (PFC)-amygdala functional connectivity (fc). Further we assessed the effects of fc-NF on neural measures, emotional/metacognitive measures and their associations. Finally, we probed the mechanism underlying fc-NF by examining concentrations of inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmitters. Results showed that NF implementations differentially modulate PFC-amygdala fc. Using the most effective NF implementation we observed important relationships between neural and emotional/metacognitive measures, such as practice-related change in fc was related with change in thought control ability. Further, we found that the relationship between state anxiety prior to the MRI session and the effect of fc-NF was moderated by GABA concentrations in the PFC and anterior cingulate cortex. To conclude, we were able to show that fc-NF can be used in adolescent females to shape neural and emotional/metacognitive measures underlying emotion regulation. We further show that neurotransmitter concentrations moderate fc-NF-effects.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrainBrain MappingCognitionEmotional RegulationFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeurofeedbackAdolescenceBrain-computer-interfaceConnectivityEmotion regulationMagnetic resonance spectroscopyNeurofeedback

Identifiers

PMID32574803
PMCPMC7573536
OpenAlexW3036845816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.