Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32574595›Full record

SynthesisJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2020

Survival After Mediastinal Node Dissection, Systematic Sampling, or Neither for Early Stage NSCLC.

Meredith A Ray, Matthew P Smeltzer, Nicholas R Faris, Raymond U Osarogiagbon

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: Overview of Challenges and Opportunities in Revising the Nodal Classification of Lung Cancer.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meredith A RayDivision of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.
Matthew P SmeltzerDivision of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.
Nicholas R FarisMultidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Raymond U OsarogiagbonMultidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee. Electronic address: rosarogi@bmhcc.org.
University of Memphis · USBaptist Memorial Hospital · US

Funding

Improving pathologic nodal staging of resected lung cancerR01CA172253 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI OSAROGIAGBON, RAYMOND U · 2013 to 2022
$4.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 found no survival difference between patients with early stage NSCLC who had mediastinal nodal dissection or systematic sampling. However, a meta-analysis of 1980 patients in five randomized controlled trials from 1989 to 2007 associated better survival with nodal dissection. We tested the survival impact of the extent of nodal dissection in curative-intent resections for early stage NSCLC in a population-based observational cohort.

methodsResections for clinical T1 or T2, N0 or nonhilar N1, M0 NSCLC in four contiguous United States Hospital Referral Regions from 2009 to 2019 were categorized into mediastinal nodal dissection, systematic sampling, and "neither" on the basis of of the evaluation of lymph node stations. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics, perioperative complication rates, and survival after assessing statistical interactions and confounding.

resultsOf the 1942 eligible patients, 18% had nodal dissection, 6% had systematic sampling, and 75% had an intraoperative nodal evaluation that met neither standard. In teaching hospitals, nodal dissection was associated with a lower hazard of death than "neither" resections (0.57 [95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.79]) but not systematic sampling (0.74 [0.40-1.37]) after adjusting for multiple comparisons. There was no significant difference in hazard ratios at nonteaching institutions (p > 0.3 for all comparisons). Perioperative complication rates were not significantly worse after mediastinal nodal dissection or systematic sampling, compared with "neither," (p > 0.1 for all comparisons).

conclusionsIn teaching institutions, mediastinal nodal dissection was associated with superior survival over less-comprehensive pathologic nodal staging. There was no survival difference between teaching and nonteaching institutions, a finding that warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDissectionFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMediastinumMedicareMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingACOSOG Z0030Mediastinal lymphadenectomyQuality of surgical careSurvivalThoracic oncology

Identifiers

PMID32574595
PMCPMC7787197
OpenAlexW3036424423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.