Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32574197›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Host range, morphological and genomic characterisation of bacteriophages with activity against clinical Streptococcus agalactiae isolates.

Lucy L Furfaro, Matthew S Payne, Barbara J Chang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Revisiting typing systems for group BMicrobial genomics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Comprehensive Characterization of aPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucy L FurfaroThe School of Medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7652-0713
Matthew S PayneThe School of Medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
Barbara J ChangThe School of Biomedical Sciences, The Marshall Centre for Infectious Diseases Research and Training, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
The University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Streptococcus agalactiae or Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of sepsis in neonates. As a preventative measure prophylactic antibiotic administration is common in pregnant women colonised with GBS, but antibiotic-resistance and adverse effects on neonatal microbiomes may result. Use of bacteriophages (phages) is one option for targeted therapy. To this end, four phages (LF1 -LF4) were isolated from wastewater. They displayed lytic activity in vitro against S. agalactiae isolates collected from pregnant women and neonates, with 190/246 isolates (77.2%) and 10/10 (100%) isolates susceptible to at least one phage, respectively. Phage genomes ranged from 32,205-44,768 bp and all phages were members of the Siphoviridae family. High nucleotide identity (99.9%) was observed between LF1 and LF4, which were closely related to a putative prophage of S. agalactiae. The genome organisation of LF2 differed, and it showed similarity to a different S. agalactiae prophage, while LF3 was more closely related to a Streptococcus pyogenes phage. Lysogenic gene presence (integrase, repressor and regulatory modules), was suggestive of temperate phages. In a therapeutic context, temperate phages are not ideal candidates, however, the broad host range activity of these phages observed on clinical isolates in vitro is promising for future therapeutic approaches including bioengineered phage or lysin applications.

Indexed as

Phage TherapyDNA, ViralFemaleGenomicsHost SpecificityHumansInfant, NewbornLysogenyNeonatal SepsisPhylogenyPregnancySiphoviridaeStreptococcus agalactiaeStreptococcus PhagesStreptococcus pyogenesDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID32574197
PMCPMC7310703
OpenAlexW3037230071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.