Observational studyPloS one2020
Long term impact of ladder-related injuries as measured by the AQoL instrument.
Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLadder-related falls are a common cause of patients presenting to emergency departments (ED) with serious injury. The impacts of ladder-related injuries were assessed at six-months post-injury using the quality of life, AQoL 4D Basic (AQoL) instrument. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a prospective observational study, conducted and reported according to the STROBE statement. All adult patients with ladder-related injuries who presented to two EDs in southeast Queensland, Australia between October 2015 and October 2016 were approached. Initial participant interviews took place at the time of ED presentation or shortly thereafter, with follow-up telephone interview at six-months.
resultsThere were 177 enrolments, 43 (24%) were lost to follow up. There were statistically significant changes post-injury for three of the four AQoL dimensions: independence, social relationships and psychological wellbeing, as well as the global AQoL. Twenty-four (18%) participants reported a clinically significant deterioration in independence, 26 (20%) participants reported a clinically significant deterioration in their social relationships, and 34 participants (40%) reporting a clinically significant deterioration in their psychological wellbeing. Nine of the twelve individual items (in AQoL dimension) deteriorated after injury, there was no change in two items (vision and hearing) and an improvement reported in one (communication). The largest changes (> 25% of participants) were reported with sleeping, anxiety worry and depression, and pain. Across the global AQoL dimension, 65 (49%) participants reported a clinically significant deterioration. The severity of injury as measured by the ISS was an independent predictor of the change in AQoL scores (p<0.001).
conclusionsInjuries related to falls from ladders continue to have a profound impact on patients at six-months post-injury as measured using the AQoL instrument. This adds to previous research which has demonstrated considerable morbidity and mortality at the time of injury. PREVENTION: Older males using ladders at home are at high risk for serious long-term injury. Injury prevention strategies and the safety instructions packaged with the ladder need to be targeted to this at-risk community group. There may also be a role for regulatory bodies to mandate a stabilising device to be included with the ladder at the time of purchase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.