Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32574172›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Prairie plants harbor distinct and beneficial root-endophytic bacterial communities.

Boahemaa Adu-Oppong, Scott A Mangan, Claudia Stein, Christopher P Catano, Jonathan A Myers, Gautam Dantas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Boahemaa Adu-OppongThe Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1185-6598
Scott A ManganDepartment of Biology and Tyson Research Center, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Claudia SteinDepartment of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University at Montgomery, Montgomery, Alabama, United States of America.
Christopher P CatanoDepartment of Biology and Tyson Research Center, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Jonathan A MyersDepartment of Biology and Tyson Research Center, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Gautam DantasThe Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0455-8370
Washington University in St. Louis · USAuburn University at Montgomery · US

Funding

METAGENOMIC ENGINEERING OF PROBIOTIC BACTERIA TO IMPROVE INTESTINAL COLONIZATIONDP2DK098089 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DANTAS, GAUTAM · 2012 to 2012
$2.1M
ESTABLISHMENT AND DYNAMICS OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE RESERVOIRS IN DEVELOPING INTER01GM099538 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DANTAS, GAUTAM · 2013 to 2016
$1.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS DP2 DK098089NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-soil feedback studies attempt to understand the interplay between composition of plant and soil microbial communities. A growing body of literature suggests that plant species can coexist when they interact with a subset of the soil microbial community that impacts plant performance. Most studies focus on the microbial community in the soil rhizosphere; therefore, the degree to which the bacterial community within plant roots (root-endophytic compartment) influences plant-microbe interactions remains relatively unknown. To determine if there is an interaction between conspecific vs heterospecific soil microbes and plant performance, we sequenced root-endophytic bacterial communities of five tallgrass-prairie plant species, each reciprocally grown with soil microbes from each hosts' soil rhizosphere. We found evidence of plant-soil feedbacks for some pairs of plant hosts; however, the strength and direction of feedbacks varied substantially across plant species pairs-from positive to negative feedbacks. Additionally, each plant species harbored a unique subset of root-endophytic bacteria. Conspecifics that hosted similar bacterial communities were more similar in biomass than individuals that hosted different bacterial communities, suggesting an important functional link between root-endophytic bacterial community composition and plant fitness. Our findings suggest a connection between an understudied component of the root-endophytic microbiome and plant performance, which may have important implications in understanding plant community composition and coexistence.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyBacteriaEndophytesGrasslandMicrobiotaPhylogenyPlant DevelopmentPlant RootsPlantsRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID32574172
PMCPMC7310688
OpenAlexW3038036401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.