Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32574137›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2020

Systematic Patient Navigation Strategies to Scale Breast Cancer Disparity Reduction by Improved Cancer Prevention and Care Delivery Processes.

Melissa A Simon, Julia R Trosman, Bruce Rapkin, Sarah S Rittner, Elizabeth Adetoro, Marcie C Kirschner, Catherine A O'Brian, Laura S Tom, Christine B Weldon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of patient navigation programs across the entire continuum of breast cancer care: a GRADE-assessed systematic review with meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa A SimonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Julia R TrosmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Bruce RapkinDivision of Community Collaboration & Implementation Sciences, Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Sarah S RittnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Elizabeth AdetoroAllianceChicago, Chicago, IL.
Marcie C KirschnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Catherine A O'BrianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Laura S TomDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Christine B WeldonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Northwestern University · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Montefiore Academic Community NCORP ProgramUG1CA189859 · NCI · MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER (BRONX, NY) · PI Balazs Halmos, Della Makower · 2014 to 2026
$10.8M
Patient Navigation 2.0: Addressing the Challenge of Scaling Navigation through Checklist-based ImplementationR01CA163830 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SIMON, MELISSA A. · 2012 to 2024
$5.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163830NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient navigation uses trained personnel to eliminate barriers to timely care across all phases of the health care continuum, thereby reducing health disparities. However, patient navigation has yet to be systematized in implementation models to improve processes of care at scale rather than remain a band-aid approach focused solely on improving care for the individual patient. The 4R systems engineering approach (right information and right treatment to the right patient at the right time) uses project management discipline principles to develop care sequence templates that serve as patient-centered project plans guiding patients and their care team.

methodsA case-study approach focused on the underserved patient shows how facilitators to timely breast cancer screening and care pragmatically identified as emergent data by patient navigators can be actionized by iteratively revising 4R care sequence templates to incorporate new insights as they emerge.

resultsUsing a case study of breast cancer screening of a low-income patient, we illustrate how 4R care sequence templates can be revised to incorporate emergent facilitators to care identified through patient navigation.

conclusionUse of care sequence templates can inform the care team to optimize a particular patient's care, while functioning as a learning health care system for process improvement of patient care and patient navigation scaling. A learning health care system approach that systematically integrates data patterns emerging from multiple patient navigation experiences through in-person navigators and 4R care sequence templates may improve processes of care and allow patient navigation scaling to reduce cancer disparities.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyPatient NavigationDelivery of Health CareEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID32574137
PMCPMC8462600
OpenAlexW3036590798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.