Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32573981›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2020

Expanded carrier screening in Chinese patients seeking the help of assisted reproductive technology.

Yanping Xi, Guangquan Chen, Caixia Lei, Junping Wu, Shuo Zhang, Min Xiao, Wenbi Zhang, Yueping Zhang, Xiaoxi Sun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yanping XiShanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0689-790X
Guangquan ChenWuXi NextCODE Genomics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Caixia LeiShanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Junping WuShanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shuo ZhangShanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Min XiaoShanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wenbi ZhangShanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yueping ZhangShanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoxi SunShanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CNWuXi AppTec (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpanded carrier screening (ECS) has emerged as an effective approach to identify at-risk couples (ARCs)-before they initiate attempts at reproduction-who possess a high probability of having a child affected by severe recessive diseases. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of ECS in Chinese patients seeking the help of assisted reproductive technology (ART).

methodsAn ECS test, which covers 201 genes implicated in 135 recessive (autosomal or X-linked) diseases, was routinely offered to all ART patients in a single genetics and in vitro fertilization clinic. Additional options for preimplantation or prenatal genetic diagnosis were discussed and offered to all ARCs. All ECS results were aggregated and the clinical decisions of the ARCs were surveyed.

resultsA total of 2,923 ART patients, representing 1,462 couples, were screened. Overall, 46.73% of the individuals were found to be the carriers for at least 1 of the 135 diseases. Of the tested couples, 2.26% (n = 33) were identified as ARCs. As of the completion of this study, 21 (63.6%) ARCs have decided to avert an affected pregnancy with the help of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenetic conditions. The cumulative carrier rate of the 187 autosomal recessive genes in the ECS panel for the 2,836 Han Chinese individuals without a family history was estimated to be 45.91%. The estimated at-risk couple rate indicates that the screening for only the top 31 genes with gene carrier rates >0.5% would identify more than 94% of the ARCs identified by screening all 187 genes.

conclusionOur study demonstrates that ESC yields a significant clinical value for ART patients in China. In addition, by estimating the yields of the ECS panel, we identify genes that are appropriate for screening the Han population.

Indexed as

AdultChinaFemaleGenes, RecessiveGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansMalePreimplantation DiagnosisPrenatal DiagnosisReproductive Techniques, Assistedassisted reproductive technologyexpanded carrier screeningHan Chinese ethnicitypreimplantation genetic testingrecessive disease

Identifiers

PMID32573981
PMCPMC7507411
OpenAlexW3037920030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.