Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32573701›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

The Epigenetic Pacemaker: modeling epigenetic states under an evolutionary framework.

Colin Farrell, Sagi Snir, Matteo Pellegrini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Embracing non-linearity in human ageing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Determining the age of single cells using scMLEAge.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Colin FarrellDepartment of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sagi SnirDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Matteo PellegriniDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Validation and optimization of epigenetic clocksU01AG060908 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RITZ, BEATE R. · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
Biomedical Big Data Training GrantT32CA201160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PELLEGRINI, MATTEO · 2015 to 2015
$264k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA201160NIA NIH HHS U01 AG060908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryEpigenetic rates of change, much as evolutionary mutation rate along a lineage, vary during lifetime. Accurate estimation of the epigenetic state has vast medical and biological implications. To account for these non-linear epigenetic changes with age, we recently developed a formalism inspired by the Pacemaker model of evolution that accounts for varying rates of mutations with time. Here, we present a python implementation of the Epigenetic Pacemaker (EPM), a conditional expectation maximization algorithm that estimates epigenetic landscapes and the state of individuals and may be used to study non-linear epigenetic aging. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The EPM is available at https://pypi.org/project/EpigeneticPacemaker/ under the MIT license. The EPM is compatible with python version 3.6 and above.

Indexed as

EpigenomicsPacemaker, ArtificialAgingAlgorithmsEpigenesis, GeneticHumansSoftware

Identifiers

PMID32573701
PMCPMC7750963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.