Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32573507›Full record

ArticleActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2020

Nurses' interventions to promote cancer patient engagement and related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Loris Bonetti, Angela Tolotti, Dario Valcarenghi, Guendalina Graffigna, Tiziana Nania, Davide Sari, Paola Ferri, Serena Barello

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Patient Engagement in Oncology Practice: A Qualitative Study on Patients' and Nurses' Perspectives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Loris BonettiNursing Development and Research Unit, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, CH. loris.bonetti@eoc.ch.
Angela TolottiNursing Development and Research Unit, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, CH. angela.tolotti@eoc.ch.
Dario ValcarenghiNursing Development and Research Unit, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, CH. dario.valcarenghi@eoc.ch.
Guendalina GraffignaEngageMinds HUB - Consumer, Food and Health Engagement Research Center. Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.. guendalina.graffigna@unicatt.it.
Tiziana NaniaEngageMinds HUB - Consumer, Food and Health Engagement Research Center. Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.. Tiziana.Nania@grupposandonato.it.
Davide SariNursing department, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, CH.. davide.sari@eoc.ch.
Paola FerriDepartment of Diagnostic, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.. paola.ferri@unimore.it.
Serena BarelloEngageMinds HUB - Consumer, Food and Health Engagement Research Center. Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.. serena.barello@unicatt.it.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and aim of the workDue to the ageing of cancer patients, new approaches that require a more active participation in the self-management of cancer treatment at home are needed. Nurses are strategic in improving the patient's engagement capability in this regard. Knowing which interventions are more effective for the promotion of patient engagement could be useful to improve the effectiveness of the care provided. Therefore, this study aims to systematically review nursing interventions or programs that promote patient engagement in oncological nursing care and summarizing the main evidence related to their impact on relevant clinical and psychosocial outcomes.

methodThis is a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol based on Cochrane Handbook for the systematic review of interventions. We will search the most important electronic databases (PUBMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, SCOPUS, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane library) to find out which patient engagement interventions (active adult patient involvement) are implemented in oncological settings and understand what is the effectiveness of these interventions on the outcomes reported in the literature. The GRADE methodology will be used to synthetize the evidence. If possible, also a meta-analysis will be performed. We registered the study protocol on the PROSPERO database (N° CRD42020146189). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to address this clinical question in the field of oncology. This review will offer health professionals indications on the most frequently adopted patient engagement interventions and verify their clinical effectiveness. Furthermore, any gaps in the scientific literature will be highlighted.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicNurse's RolePatient ParticipationResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicAdultHumansNeoplasmsNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32573507
PMCPMC7975835
OpenAlexW3038055150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.