Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32573464›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2020

Perspectives of Patients and Professionals on Information and Education After Myocardial Infarction With Insight for Mixed Reality Implementation: Cross-Sectional Interview Study.

Alexander D Hilt, Kevin Mamaqi Kapllani, Beerend P Hierck, Anne C Kemp, Armagan Albayrak, Marijke Melles, Martin J Schalij, Roderick W C Scherptong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Myocardial infarction care in low and high socioeconomic environments: claims data analysis.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Information Needs and Communication Strategies for People with Coronary Heart Disease: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander D Hilt *Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-0906
Kevin Mamaqi Kapllani *Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3814-1541
Beerend P HierckDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7170-1686
Anne C KempFaculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1045-2639
Armagan AlbayrakFaculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5801-3670
Marijke MellesFaculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6342-6493
Martin J SchalijDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3767-5231
Roderick W C ScherptongDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9125-4601
Delft University of Technology · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient education is crucial in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Novel technologies such as augmented reality or mixed reality expand the possibilities for providing visual support in this process. Mixed reality creates interactive digital three-dimensional (3D) projections overlaying virtual objects on the real-world environment. While augmented reality only overlays objects, mixed reality not just overlays but anchors virtual objects to the real world. However, research on this technology in the patient domain is scarce.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to understand how patients perceive information provided after myocardial infarction and examine if mixed reality can be supportive in this process.

methodsIn total, 12 patients that experienced myocardial infarction and 6 health care professionals were enrolled in the study. Clinical, demographic, and qualitative data were obtained through semistructured interviews, with a main focus on patient experiences within the hospital and the knowledge they gained about their disease. These data were then used to map a susceptible timeframe to identify how mixed reality can contribute to patient information and education.

resultsKnowledge transfer after myocardial infarction was perceived by patients as too extensive, not personal, and inconsistent. Notably, knowledge on anatomy and medication was minimal and was not recognized as crucial by patients, whereas professionals stated the opposite. Patient journey analysis indicated the following four critical phases of knowledge transfer: at hospital discharge, at the first outpatient visit, during rehabilitation, and during all follow-up outpatient visits. Important patient goals were understanding the event in relation to daily life and its implications on resuming daily life. During follow-up, understanding physical limitations and coping with the condition and medication side effects in daily life emerged as the most important patient goals. The professionals' goals were to improve recovery, enhance medication adherence, and offer coping support.

conclusionsThere is a remarkable difference between patients' and professionals' goals regarding information and education after myocardial infarction. Mixed reality may be a practical tool to unite perspectives of patients and professionals on the disease in a more even manner, and thus optimize knowledge transfer after myocardial infarction. Improving medication knowledge seems to be a feasible target for mixed reality. However, further research is needed to create durable methods for education on medication through mixed reality interventions.

Indexed as

human factorsmixed realitymyocardial infarctionpatient educationpatient experiencePROM

Identifiers

PMID32573464
PMCPMC7381062
OpenAlexW3016040665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.