ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2020
The efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with previous failed augmentation cystoplasty: Cohort series and literature review.
Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo investigate the role of onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) injections in patients with failed augmentation cystoplasty for neuropathic or idiopathic detrusor overactivity (NDO or IDO).
methodsA retrospective review of all cystoplasty patients who underwent onabotulinumtoxinA injection at a tertiary center between 2008 and 2019 was performed. Details including indications and time from cystoplasty, video-urodynamic parameters, onabotulinumtoxinA dose, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Telephone interview was performed for patients that requested repeat onabotulinumtoxinA injections. The interview included a modified PGIC7 and UDI6 questionnaires. A positive clinical response was considered improvement of overactive symptoms sufficient to merit repeat onabotulinumtoxinA injection and a modified PGIC7 of four or above.
resultsThirty patients were identified (11 men and 19 women). The indications for augmentation were IDO (n = 18) or NDO (n = 12). Mean age at the time of cystoplasty was 42 years (range, 10-61). Interval between cystoplasty and initial onabotulinumtoxinA was 98 months (range, 3-271). Video-urodynamics before onabotulinumtoxinA revealed low compliance in 13 patients, DO in 22 patients, and combined low compliance/DO in 10. The median maximum cystometric bladder capacity was 338 mL (range, 77-570 mL). Thirteen patients responded to onabotulinumtoxinA injections. Higher peak DO pressure was associated with a significantly higher chance that the patient would experience benefit from the injections P = .026). The patients that responded to onabotulinumtoxin A underwent a total of 115 procedures (mean, 8.8 injections) over a mean 88 months (range, 20-157 months).
conclusionsForty-three percent of patients responded well to intra-detrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections. This avoided the need for more invasive surgery and had a positive impact on their quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.