Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32572961›Full record

ReviewJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2020

Practitioner review: Co-design of digital mental health technologies with children and young people.

Rhys Bevan Jones, Paul Stallard, Sharifah Shameem Agha, Simon Rice, Aliza Werner-Seidler, Karolina Stasiak, Jason Kahn, Sharon A Simpson, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez, Frances Rice and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06933823 (Dietary Modification Intervention Involving Family Support), which is not on this map. Cited by 156 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
156citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06933823 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Dietary Modification Intervention Involving Family Support (FamNUTRI) for Managing Sarcopenic Obesity Among Community-dwelling Older Adults: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled72ConditionsSarcopenic ObesityArmsDietary modification intervention involving family support, Dietary modification intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

156 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 301 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review of theories, models and frameworks used for youth engagement in health research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. An umbrella review of reviews on challenges to meaningful adolescent involvement in health research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Developing Public Service Announcements to Help Prevent Suicide among Young People.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The #chatsafe Youth Participation Model: Evaluating Participatory Workshops Involving Young People in the Design of Suicide Prevention Initiatives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

96 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Rhys Bevan JonesDivision of Psychological Medicine & Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8976-9825
Paul StallardDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Sharifah Shameem AghaDivision of Psychological Medicine & Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Simon RiceOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Aliza Werner-SeidlerBlack Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Karolina StasiakFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jason KahnBoston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sharon A SimpsonMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Mario Alvarez-JimenezOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Frances RiceDivision of Psychological Medicine & Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Rhiannon EvansDECIPHer, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Sally MerryFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8281-1573
Cwm Taf University Health Board · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZBlack Dog Institute · AUBoston Children's Hospital · USCardiff University · GBCentre for Mental Health · GBMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU14Department of Health NIHR-PDF-2018HCRW_ NIHR-FS-PD-2018Medical Research Council MC_PC_13027Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/14Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017_14Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1Medical Research Council MR/L010305/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increasing interest in digital technologies to help improve children and young people's mental health, and the evidence for the effectiveness for these approaches is rising. However, there is concern regarding levels of user engagement, uptake and adherence. Key guidance regarding digital health interventions stress the importance of early user input in the development, evaluation and implementation of technologies to help ensure they are engaging, feasible, acceptable and potentially effective. Co-design is a process of active involvement of stakeholders, requiring a change from the traditional approaches to intervention development. However, there is a lack of literature to inform the co-design of digital technologies to help child and adolescent mental health.

methodsWe reviewed the literature and practice in the co-design of digital mental health technologies with children and young people. We searched Medline, PsycInfo and Web of Science databases, guidelines, reviews and reference lists, contacted key authors for relevant studies, and extracted key themes on aspects of co-design relevant to practice. We supplemented this with case studies and methods reported by researchers working in the field.

resultsWe identified 25 original articles and 30 digital mental health technologies that were designed/developed with children and young people. The themes identified were as follows: principles of co-design (including potential stakeholders and stages of involvement), methods of involving and engaging the range of users, co-designing the prototype and the challenges of co-design.

conclusionsCo-design involves all relevant stakeholders throughout the life and research cycle of the programme. This review helps to inform practitioners and researchers interested in the development of digital health technologies for children and young people. Future work in this field will need to consider the changing face of technology, methods of engaging with the diversity in the user group, and the evaluation of the co-design process and its impact on the technology.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyMental HealthAdolescentChildHumansadolescentChildco-designdevelopmentdigitale-healthmental healthtechnologies

Identifiers

PMID32572961
PMCPMC7611975
OpenAlexW3037803689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.