Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32572868›Full record

ReviewDeutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2020

[Smoke-free Germany 2040: a discussion paper].

Reiner Hanewinkel, Matthis Morgenstern, Barbara Isensee, Friedrich J Wiebel

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Binge drinking in early adolescence : Results of the "Präventionsradar" from 2016 to 2023].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. [Shaded places for skin cancer prevention in kindergartens and schools].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Reiner HanewinkelInstitut für Therapie- und Gesundheitsforschung, IFT-Nord gGmbH, Kiel.
Matthis MorgensternInstitut für Therapie- und Gesundheitsforschung, IFT-Nord gGmbH, Kiel.
Barbara IsenseeInstitut für Therapie- und Gesundheitsforschung, IFT-Nord gGmbH, Kiel.
Friedrich J WiebelÄrztlicher Arbeitskreis Rauchen und Gesundheit e. V., Eching/München.
Institute for Therapy and Health Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA "smoke-free" society is assumed if less than 5 % of a population smoke. We predict when this goal could be reached in Germany. To reduce the proportion of smokers in the population, the World Health Organization recommends a bundle of measures (MPOWER) that should minimize both the supply of and the demand for tobacco. The current level of implementation of these recommendations in Germany is presented.

methodsA total of 21 representative cross-sectional surveys of the Drug Affinity Study and the Epidemiological Survey of Substance Abuse since 2000/2001 with adolescents and adults show the smoking behavior of the population until 2018. Per capita consumption of factory-built and self-made cigarettes during the same period is used as an objective data basis. Regression analyses are used to model the date at which less than 5 % of the German population smoke. A selective literature review is carried out to describe the implementation of the MPOWER program.

resultsBefore 2000 there was no trend in Germany towards non-smoking. After the implementation of various preventive measures such as price increases for tobacco products and the introduction of non-smoking protection laws, the spread of smoking among the population has steadily decreased since 2000. By 2018, the 5 % prevalence target among adolescents had almost been reached, as the relative proportion of adolescents who smoked fell by 20.9 percentage points to 6.6 %. The relative proportion of smoking in adult women fell by 12.1 percentage points to 18.5 %, the relative proportion of smoking in men by 14.8 percentage points to 24.2 %. Assuming a linear trend, the prevalence target of less than 5 % smoking adults can be reached by around 2043. Of the six recommended measures of the MPOWER program, Germany is currently only implementing the monitoring of tobacco consumption in society without compromises. DISCUSSION: After various tobacco prevention measures were implemented, a trend towards non-smoking began in Germany. The continual price increase recommended by the World Health Organization, the further restriction of availability, the ban on all tobacco advertising and promotion, the support of smoking cessation as well as the education of the population appear to be necessary to reinforce this trend and to achieve the health policy goal of a smoke-free society in 2040.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationSmoking PreventionAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHealth EducationHealth PolicyHumansMaleSmokingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32572868
PMCPMC7481020
OpenAlexW3037640118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.