ArticleEndoscopy2020
Teamworking in endoscopy: a human factors toolkit for the COVID-19 era.
Article in Endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simulation-Based Training for Endoscopy Nurses Improves Device-to-Field Time: A Prospective Study.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Enhancing Collaboration in the Endoscopy Suite: Challenges, Perspectives, and Solutions.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Article
- Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) framework for managing underperformance in gastrointestinal endoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Improved team communication in endoscopic procedures by digital enhanced telecommunication during the COVID-19 pandemic.Endoscopy international open · 2022Article
- Green endoscopy: practical implementation.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022Article
- JAG consensus statements for training and certification in oesophagogastroduodenoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Inflammatory bowel disease clinical service recovery during the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Teams and endoscopy: another effect of the COVID-19 pandemic.Endoscopy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopy services have had to rapidly adapt their working practices in response to COVID-19. As recovery of endoscopy services proceeds, our workforce faces numerous challenges that can impair effective teamworking. We designed and developed a novel toolkit to support teamworking in endoscopy during the pandemic.
methodsA human factors model was developed to understand the impact of COVID-19 on endoscopy teams. From this, we identified a set of key teamworking goals, which informed the development of a toolkit to support several team processes. The toolkit was refined following expert input and refinement over a 6-week period.
resultsThe toolkit consists of four cognitive aids that can be used to support team huddles, briefings, and debriefs, alongside techniques to optimize endoscopic nontechnical skills across the patient-procedure pathway. We describe the processes that local endoscopy units can employ to implement this toolkit.
conclusionA toolkit of cognitive aids, based on human factors principles, may be useful in supporting teams, helping them adapt to working safely in the era of COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.