ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
LARS study: Latin American rheumatologist survey.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial: Women in science - rheumatology 2023.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Gender representation in rheumatology journals: an assessment of editors, editorial boards, and authors.Rheumatology international · 2023Article
- Current status of the rheumatologists' workforce in Latin America: a PANLAR collaborative study.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Article
- Rheumatologists in Ecuador: Results of a Survey.Scientifica · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectiveLatin America has scarce information related to rheumatologist's education, working conditions, productivity, and job satisfaction. The purpose of this survey was to describe the training and clinical practice characteristics of the rheumatology community in Latin America.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional study. A digital survey was created, approved, and endorsed by the scientific committee of the Pan-American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) and later sent to the rheumatology associations of the region. The data was analyzed in the statistical program SPSS v.22.
resultsWe included 600 surveys of rheumatologists from 19 Latin American countries. The majority were females (53%) and mestizos (58%). The mean age was 46.8 ± 11.7 years. The most frequent workplace was public/government hospitals 33.5% followed by private practice 28.8%, private hospital 20.8%, and university hospital 15.5%. The average number of weekly working hours was 37.8 ± 17.7. 87.5% worked in adult rheumatology, 12.7% pediatric rheumatology, and 23.5% internal medicine. Average satisfaction with practice as a rheumatologist was 5.3/7, career options 4.3/7, location 4.7/7, income 3.5/7, job security 3.7/7, and colleagues and co-workers 4.5/7. Finally, 69.7% had an annual compensation of < 50,000 US dollars.
conclusionsThe majority of the rheumatologists in the region who responded were women, worked in public hospitals, and were satisfied with their clinical practice. There was a low level of income for the region. Key Points • This is the first study that showed the demographic and clinical practice characteristics of rheumatologists in Latin America. • The challenges faced by Latin rheumatologists are like those faced by the region: ethnic diversity, gender differences, migration, difficult access to education, limited research, and low income. • Due to the high prevalence of rheumatic diseases and the shortage of professionals in this area, it is essential to analyze the current workforce and the projections of supply and demand in rheumatology that are expected in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32572803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.