Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32572792›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2021

Posttherapy topographical nodal status, ypN-site, predicts survival of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative surgical resection for non-type 4 locally advanced gastric cancer: supplementary analysis of JCOG1004-A.

Kazumasa Fujitani, Kenichi Nakamura, Jyunki Mizusawa, Takeshi Kuwata, Tadakazu Shimoda, Hiroshi Katayama, Ryoji Kushima, Hirokazu Taniguchi, Takaki Yoshikawa, Narikazu Boku and 5 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adjuvant treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer: an Asian perspective.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kazumasa FujitaniDepartment of Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, 3-1-56 Bandai-higashi, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka, 558-8558, Japan. fujitani@gh.opho.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4954-5047
Kenichi NakamuraJCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Jyunki MizusawaJCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi KuwataNational Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Tadakazu ShimodaDivision of Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Japan.
Hiroshi KatayamaJCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryoji KushimaNational Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirokazu TaniguchiNational Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takaki YoshikawaDivision of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Narikazu BokuDivision of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masanori TerashimaDivision of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Japan.
Haruhiko FukudaJCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi SanoDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsuru SasakoYodogawa Christian Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Stomach Cancer Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG), Japan

Funding

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 29-A-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerioperative treatment is an accepted standard approach for treating locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). Histopathological tumor regression with < 10% residual tumor is a globally accepted prognosticator in LAGC patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and curative surgery. However, despite a response of the primary tumor, a significant percentage of patients dies from recurrence and identification of those at risk for relapse remains challenging. We re-estimated the value of histopathological tumor regression as a prognosticator alongside other factors, especially posttherapy topographical nodal status, ypN-site. PATIENTS AND

methodsIndividual patient data including clinicopathological variables were used from the four JCOG trials investigating NAC (JCOG0001, JCOG0002, JCOG0210, JCOG0405) for analyzing prognosticators in patients with curative surgery excluding those with type 4 AGC by univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses.

resultsAmong 85 patients, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 46.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 35.0-56.4] with a median follow-up of 3.2 years. On univariable analysis, histopathological tumor regression with ≥ 10% residual tumor and ypN-site 2-3 were negatively associated with OS [≥ 10% residual tumor: hazard ratio (HR) 2.60; 95% CI 1.22-5.54; P = 0.014; ypN2-3: HR 3.59; 95% CI 1.60-8.06; P = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, only ypN-site 2-3 was predictive of OS (HR 3.67; 95% CI 1.55-8.69; P = 0.003), whereas histopathological tumor regression with ≥ 10% residual tumor was not (HR 2.24; 95% CI 0.98-5.10; P = 0.055).

conclusionsypN-site may have greater impact on OS than histopathological tumor regression in patients who received NAC plus surgery for non-type 4 LAGC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicFemaleGastrectomyHumansLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm, ResidualPostoperative PeriodPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesHistopathological tumor regressionLocally advanced gastric cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyOverall survivalPosttherapy nodal status

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.