Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32572791›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2021

Clinical significance of endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing invasion depth of early gastric cancer prior to endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Kazutaka Kuroki, Shiro Oka, Shinji Tanaka, Naoki Yorita, Kosaku Hata, Takahiro Kotachi, Tomoyuki Boda, Koji Arihiro, Kazuaki Chayama

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Validity of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Cancer Diagnosed as Differentiated Adenocarcinoma Before Treatment Regardless of Lesion Size.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kazutaka KurokiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima, Japan. d163308@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
Shiro OkaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima, Japan.
Shinji TanakaDepartment of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima, Japan.
Naoki YoritaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kosaku HataDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima, Japan.
Takahiro KotachiDepartment of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima, Japan.
Tomoyuki BodaDepartment of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima, Japan.
Koji ArihiroDepartment of Pathology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kazuaki ChayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, Kasumi 1-2-3, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroshima University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimEndoscopic ultrasonography is a reliable diagnostic modality for determining indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. We aimed to clarify the clinical significance of endoscopic ultrasonography in the invasion depth diagnosis of early gastric cancer.

methodsWe retrospectively assessed 1598 consecutive patients with 2001 early gastric cancers who underwent EUS before ESD or surgery between October 2010 and April 2019 at our institution. Lesions were classified according to endoscopic ultrasonography-determined invasion depth as EUS-M/SM1 (lesions confined to sonographic layers 1 and 2 or lesions with changes in sonographic layer 3; depth, < 1 mm) and EUS-SM2 (lesions with changes in sonographic layer 3; depth, ≥ 1 mm). We evaluated the invasion depth determination accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and analyzed the clinicopathological features of misdiagnosed early gastric cancer cases.

resultsThe invasion depth determination accuracy was as follows: EUS-M/SM1: pathological T1a/T1b1 early gastric cancer, 97%; EUS-SM2: pathological T1b2 early gastric cancer, 79%. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 95%, 98%, 69%, 97%, and 79%, respectively. In EUS-M/SM1 early gastric cancer, tumor size of ≥ 15 mm, presence of ulceration, and undifferentiated histological type were significantly associated with endoscopic ultrasonography accuracy. In EUS-SM2 early gastric cancer, tumor size of ≥ 30 mm was significantly associated with endoscopic ultrasonography accuracy.

conclusionsEndoscopic ultrasonography is a useful modality in accurately determining the invasion depth of early gastric cancer before endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionAgedAged, 80 and overEarly Detection of CancerEndosonographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPredictive Value of TestsPreoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsAccuracyEarly gastric cancerEndoscopic ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID32572791
OpenAlexW3036602552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.