Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32572783›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2020

Targeting the right population for T3 + T4 combined therapy: where are we now and where to next?

Tommaso Porcelli, Domenico Salvatore

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The relevance of TThe lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tommaso PorcelliDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. tommasoporcelli@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6162-5819
Domenico SalvatoreDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The universal applicability of levothyroxine (LT4) monotherapy for the treatment of hypothyroidism has been questioned in recent years. Indeed, it is now clear that about 10-15% of LT4-treated hypothyroid patients are dissatisfied with their treatment. It is plausible that this subset of hypothyroid patients may need T3 + T4 combined therapy to restore peripheral euthyroidism. To address this issue, many clinical trials have investigated the effect of T3 + T4 combinations versus standard LT4-based therapy. However, to date, results have been inconclusive, mainly due to the lack of markers that identify candidates for combination therapy. A breakthrough in this field came with the recent finding that several single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the deiodinase genes are associated with the persistence of hypothyroid symptoms in biochemically euthyroid LT4-treated patients, and are thus markers of candidates for combination therapy. In addition, whole-genome association studies are expanding our knowledge of other genes of the thyroid hormone (TH) pathway that affect serum TH levels. To target the right population for the T3 + T4 combined therapy, the next step is to translate these new findings into prospective trials. Hopefully, this will pave the way to personalized therapy for each hypothyroid patient.

Indexed as

HypothyroidismTriiodothyronineHumansProspective StudiesThyroid HormonesThyrotropinThyroxineThyroid HormonesThyrotropinThyroxineTriiodothyronineDeiodinasesHypothyroidismPersonalized therapySNPsTH pathway

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.