Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32572765›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020

American College of Physicians Ethical Guidance for Electronic Patient-Physician Communication: Aligning Expectations.

Wei Wei Lee, Lois Snyder Sulmasy, American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee*

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wei Wei LeeDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Lois Snyder SulmasyCenter for Ethics and Professionalism, American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA, USA. lsnyder@acponline.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0662-8945
American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee*

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication is critical to strong patient-physician relationships and high-quality health care. In recent years, advances in health information technology have altered how patients and doctors interact and communicate. Increasingly, e-communication outside of in-person clinical encounters occurs in many ways, including through e-mail, patient-portals, texting, and messaging applications. This American College of Physicians (ACP) position paper provides ethics and professionalism guidance for these forms of e-communication to help maintain trust in patient-physician relationships and the profession and alignment between patient and physician expectations.

Indexed as

MotivationPhysiciansCommunicationElectronic MailElectronicsHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsUnited Stateselectronic communicationelectronic health recordsethicsmedical educationpatient-doctor communicationpatient-physician relationshipprofessionalism

Identifiers

PMID32572765
PMCPMC7459080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.