ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2021
Primary robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection following orchiectomy for testicular germ cell tumors: a single-surgeon experience.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research trends and collaboration patterns in robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular cancer: state of the art and future perspectives.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- [Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND) for the treatment of testicular germ cell tumors-open or robotic? Pro open surgery : RPLND in the management of testis cancer].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Focusing on chylous ascites: a noteworthy complication after laparoscopic/robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in left-sided colorectal cancer in a high-volume single center.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- Lymph Node Dissection in Testicular Cancer: The State of the Art and Future Perspectives.Current oncology reports · 2024Review
- Robotic-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for stage II testicular cancer.Asian journal of urology · 2024Article
- Postchemotherapy robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for non-seminomatous germ cell tumors in the lateral decubitus position: oncological and functional outcomes.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer at a national referral centre.BJUI compass · 2022Article
- Robotic RPLND for stage IIA/B nonseminoma: the Princess Margaret Experience.World journal of urology · 2022Review
- Indications, feasibility and outcome of robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for metastatic testicular germ cell tumours.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objectives were to evaluate the safety and oncologic efficacy of primary robotic retroperitoneal lymph node (R-RPLND) dissection for testicular germ cell tumors. A retrospective analysis was performed on all primary R-RPLND cases performed by a single surgeon, who performs both open and R-RPLND at a high-volume academic institution, between August 2013 and August 2019. Data on patient demographics, operative techniques, perioperative outcomes, and tumor characteristics were obtained. 28 men were identified who underwent primary R-RPLND. The majority of patients (N = 21, 75%) had clinical stage I disease, and a bilateral template was more commonly performed than either single side alone (N = 13, 46%). Of note, two cases involving clinical stage II disease were converted electively from robotic to open procedures at the discretion of the surgeon. R-RPLND patients experienced no intraoperative complications. The median follow-up time was 8 months (interquartile range 4-29 months). One (4%) patient developed a disease recurrence at 10 months after R-RPLND. Conclusion: primary R-RPLND is a safe and efficacious procedure for carefully selected men with stage I and II non-seminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis. Long-term data are needed to evaluate the comparative oncologic efficacy with open surgery and the notably high rate of chylous ascites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.