ReviewHeart failure reviews2022
Cardiac xenotransplantation: a promising way to treat advanced heart failure.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status and prospects of genetically modified porcine-to-human cardiac xenotransplantation.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025Review
- [Research and application progress for liver xenotransplantation].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Isolated Perfused Hearts for Cardiovascular Research: An Old Dog with New Tricks.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2024Review
- Therapeutic Effect of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix from Fish Skin for Accelerating Skin Regeneration.Marine drugs · 2024Article
- [Xenotransplantation of solid organs].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Current Status of Cardiac Xenotransplantation: Report of a Workshop of the German Heart Transplant Centers, Martinsried, March 3, 2023.The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon · 2024Article
- The pig as an optimal animal model for cardiovascular research.Lab animal · 2024Review
- Heart transplantation: advances in expanding the donor pool and xenotransplantation.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2024Review
- What Genetic Modifications of Source Pigs Are Essential and Sufficient for Cell, Tissue, and Organ Xenotransplantation?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024Review
- Disparities in donor heart acceptance between the USA and Europe: clinical implications.European heart journal · 2023Article
- Monomethyl fumarate prevents alloimmune rejection in mouse heart transplantation by inducing tolerogenic dendritic cells.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2023Article
- Cardiac xenotransplantation: from concept to clinic.Cardiovascular research · 2023Review
- Cardiology of the future: xenotransplantation with porcine heart.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac xenotransplantation (CXTx) might be a promising approach to bridge the gap between the supply and demand of a donor heart. The survival of cardiac xenograft has been significantly extended in pig-to-nonhuman primate (NHP) CXTx, with records of 195 days and 945 days for orthotropic and heterotopic CXTx, respectively. To present the history of CXTx, we list the reported clinical CXTx, compare pigs and NHPs as sources of hearts, and compare three different kinds of preclinical CXTx models. The application of genetically modified pigs and novel immunosuppressive drugs accelerates the development of CXTx, and we summarize the reported pig-to-NHP CXTx with detailed information. Besides, we discuss the underlining mechanisms and potential preventive strategies of immunological barriers, including hyperacute rejection, acute humoral xenograft rejection, acute cellular xenograft rejection, chronic rejection, coagulation dysfunction, and systemic inflammation. Though intense cellular infiltration in cardiac xenograft has only been documented in a small number of studies, we especially stress the importance of cellular rejection in CXTx, because we believe it is often masked by the rapid and strong humoral response and it may eventually become a more important and common type of xenograft rejection. In addition, we conclude other obstacles as well as possible solutions in CXTx, such as perioperative cardiac xenograft dysfunction, detrimental xenograft overgrowth, and porcine endogenous retroviruses. Finally, we briefly introduce several other approaches that have been proposed to deal with the organ heart shortage crisis, and we firmly believe that CXTx provides the best near-term solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32572737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.