ArticleInvestigational new drugs2020
Correction to: The old CEACAMs find their new role in tumor immunotherapy.
Article in Investigational new drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Glycan Biology to Drug Candidates: An Integrated Sialylation Niche Index and AI-Guided Therapeutic Framework for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Key processes in tumor metastasis and therapeutic strategies with nanocarriers: a review.Molecular biology reports · 2024Review
- Tumor buster - where will the CAR-T cell therapy 'missile' go?Molecular cancer · 2022Review
- DNA barcode to trace the development and differentiation of cord blood stem cells (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Correction is needed to the original version of this article.
Identifiers
32572666What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.