Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32572655›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2020

Is consonance attractive to budgerigars? No evidence from a place preference study.

Bernhard Wagner, Daniel L Bowling, Marisa Hoeschele

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Core systems of music perception.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bernhard WagnerAcoustics Research Institute, Wohllebengasse 12-14, 1040, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4433-2897
Daniel L BowlingDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1201 Welch Rd. MSLS P-126, Stanford, CA, 94305-5485, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5303-5472
Marisa HoescheleAcoustics Research Institute, Wohllebengasse 12-14, 1040, Vienna, Austria. marisa.hoeschele@oeaw.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2102-0882
University of Vienna · ATAcoustics Research Institute · AT

Funding

Advanced Assessment of Auditory-Vocal Affect in Autism with Speech and MusicK01MH122730 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOWLING, DANIEL LIU · 2020 to 2023
$718k
Austrian Science Fund M1732Austrian Science Fund M1773NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH122730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consonant tone combinations occur naturally in the overtone series of harmonic sounds. These include sounds that many non-human animals produce to communicate. As such, non-human animals may be attracted to consonant intervals, interpreting them, e.g., as a feature of important social stimuli. There is preliminary evidence of attraction to consonance in various bird species in the wild, but few experimental studies with birds. We tested budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) for attraction to consonant over dissonant intervals in two experiments. In Experiment 1, we tested humans and budgerigars using a place preference paradigm in which individuals could explore an environment with multiple sound sources. Both species were tested with consonant and dissonant versions of a previously studied piano melody, and we recorded time spent with each stimulus as a measure of attraction. Human females spent more time with consonant than dissonant stimuli in this experiment, but human males spent equal time with both consonant and dissonant stimuli. Neither male nor female budgerigars spent more time with either stimulus type. In Experiment 2, we tested budgerigars with more ecologically relevant stimuli comprised of sampled budgerigar vocalizations arranged into consonant or dissonant chords. These stimuli, however, also failed to produce any evidence of preference in budgerigar responses. We discuss these results in the context of ongoing research on the study of consonance as a potential general feature of auditory perception in animals with harmonic vocalizations, with respect to similarities and differences between human and budgerigar vocal behaviour, and future methodological directions.

Indexed as

MelopsittacusMusicAnimalsAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleSoundAestheticsBudgerigarsComparative cognitionConsonancePsychoacousticsVocal learning

Identifiers

PMID32572655
PMCPMC7415764
OpenAlexW3035876833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.