Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32572612›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2020

Examination of the radiographic visibility of the root pulp of the mandibular second molars as an age marker.

Suvarna M, Sudheer B Balla, Subramanyeswara S Chinni, Sathya Prakash Reddy K, Hema Gopalaiah, Pujita C, Nidhi Reddy R

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suvarna MDepartment of Dentistry, Government Medical college, Nalgonda, India.
Sudheer B BallaDepartment of Forensic Odontology, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. forensics.sudheer@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0977-3889
Subramanyeswara S Chinni, Bangalore, India.
Sathya Prakash Reddy KDepartment of Oral Medicine & Radiology, MNR Dental College & Hospital, Sangareddy, India.
Hema GopalaiahDepartment of Oral Medicine & Radiology, MNR Dental College & Hospital, Sangareddy, India.
Pujita CDepartment of Pedodontics, MNR Dental College & Hospital, Sangareddy, India.
Nidhi Reddy RDepartment of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
MNR Dental College and Hospital · INKamineni Institute of Dental Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic odontologists often confront with conceptually simple medicolegal question of whether an individual is a juvenile or an adult. The demand for additional research into extending dental age estimation methods in late adolescence is never the less, especially in those who have passed 15 years and are suspected older than 18 years. The present research investigated the regressive dental characteristic, i.e. radiographic visibility of the root pulp in mandibular second molars for the purpose of age assessment, especially for determining the age over 18 years. Nine hundred thirty-six orthopantomograms comprised of 436 males and 500 females aged from 14 to 22 years were examined. Descriptive statistics were performed for each stage in both sexes. The correlation statistics revealed that there is a strong, positive correlation between the chronological age and root pulp visibility stages. The analysis revealed that stage 0 occurred first at the age of 14 years in both sexes. Stage 1 first occurred at the age of 14.26 years in females and 14.74 years in males. Stage 2 was first achieved at the age of 18.6 and 15.2 years in males and females, respectively. The suitability of the studied characteristics in mandibular second molars for age estimation could be confirmed but of limited value. The presence of this stage 2 root pulp visibility in male subjects represents a potential criterion for indicating the age over 18 years. In future studies, the pattern of secondary dentin formation in other tooth types should be investigated.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge Determination by TeethDental PulpFemaleForensic DentistryHumansMaleMandibleMolarRadiography, PanoramicTooth RootYoung Adult18 yearsAge of majorityForensic odontologyMandibular second molarsRoot pulp visibility

Identifiers

PMID32572612
OpenAlexW3035806228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.