ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2020
Cytoplasmic VDR expression as an independent risk factor for ovarian cancer.
Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- A low nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio of VDR expression is an independent prognostic marker in breast cancer.Histology and histopathology · 2025Article
- Vitamin D May Increase the Number of CD4-CD8+ NKT-like Cells in Humans-A Novel Insight into Potential Immunomodulatory Action.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Analysis of Vitamin D and VDR Expression in Women with Advanced Endometriosis: A Case-Control Study in Thailand.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Potential of CD44, CD133, and VDR in Epithelial Ovarian Tumors: Association with Histopathology Parameters.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic profile induced by calcitriol in CaSki human cervical cancer cell line.PloS one · 2025Article
- Key genes of vitamin D metabolism and their roles in the risk and prognosis of cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Article
- Vitamins in Gynecologic Malignancies.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Article
- Vitamin D receptor is associated with prognostic characteristics of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy-an observational study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Immunohistochemical Expression of Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) in Urinary Bladder Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Turk patoloji dergisi · 2024Article
- Article
- Immunomodulatory actions of vitamin D in various immune-related disorders: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Identification of a Vitamin-D Receptor Antagonist, MeTC7, which Inhibits the Growth of Xenograft and Transgenic TumorsJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2022Article
- The role of bile acids in carcinogenesis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022Review
- Article
- Research Progress in Prognostic Factors and Biomarkers of Ovarian Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2021Review
- In focus in HCB.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The vitamin D receptor (VDR), primarily known as a crucial mediator of calcium homeostasis and metabolism, has been shown to play a significant role in various cancer entities. Previous studies have focused on vitamin D and its receptor in gynecological cancers, noting that the receptor is upregulated in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The aim of this study is to analyze the prognostic impact of VDR and its functional significance in ovarian cancer. Through immunohistochemistry, VDR staining was examined in 156 ovarian cancer samples. Evaluation of VDR staining was conducted in the nucleus and the cytoplasm using the semi-quantitative immunoreactive score, and the scores were classified into high- and low-level expressions. Expression levels were correlated with clinical and pathological parameters as well as with overall survival to assess for prognostic impact. Differences in cytoplasmic VDR expression were identified between the histological subtypes (p = 0.001). Serous, clear cell, and endometrioid subtypes showed the highest staining, while the mucinous subtype showed the lowest. Cytoplasmic VDR correlated with higher FIGO stage (p = 0.013; Cc = 0.203), positive lymph node status (p = 0.023; Cc = 0.236), high-grade serous histology (p = 0.000; Cc = 0.298) and grading from the distinct histological subtypes (p = 0.006; Cc = - 0.225). Nuclear VDR did not correlate with clinicopathological data. High cytoplasmic expression of VDR was associated with impaired overall survival (HR 2.218, 32.5 months vs. median not reached; p < 0.001) and was confirmed as a statistically independent prognostic factor in the Cox regression multivariate analysis. Additional knowledge of VDR as a biomarker and its interactions within the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway could potentially improve the prognosis of therapeutic approaches for specific subgroups in EOC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32572587PMC7532962W3036038561What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.