Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32572582›Full record

SynthesisInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2020

Work above shoulder level and shoulder complaints: a systematic review.

Morten Wærsted, Markus Koch, Kaj Bo Veiersted

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. The Correlation of Frequency of Work-Related Disorders with Type of Work among Polish Employees.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Occupational demands associated with rotator cuff disease surgery in the UK Biobank.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Risk factors for shoulder disorders among French workers: prospective cohort study.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Morten WærstedNational Institute of Occupational Health, Gydas vei 8, Majorstuen, PO Box 5330, 0304, Oslo, Norway. mwa@stami.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9570-2181
Markus KochNational Institute of Occupational Health, Gydas vei 8, Majorstuen, PO Box 5330, 0304, Oslo, Norway.
Kaj Bo VeierstedNational Institute of Occupational Health, Gydas vei 8, Majorstuen, PO Box 5330, 0304, Oslo, Norway.
National Institute of Occupational Health · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the association and the exposure-response relationship between work above shoulder height and shoulder pain or disorders.

methodsA systematic search was performed in Medline, Embase, and Health and Safety Science Abstracts. Included were articles with prospective cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, or intervention study designs. Quality assessment was based on an evaluation scheme adjusted to study design and normalized to 100%. The cut-off for sufficient quality to include articles was above 40% and cut-off for high-quality articles was above 50% of maximal score. The level of strength of evidence for an association between exposure and effect was assessed according to the GRADE guidelines.

resultsThirty-four articles were included. Articles that document large effects (higher risk estimates; OR ≥ 2) have higher quality score, include analyses of severe arm elevation, more often use clinical outcome, and report an exposure-response relationship compared to studies reporting lower risk estimates. The studies that reported large effects were all significant. An exposure-response relationship was found in many high-quality studies when relating exposure intensity of arm elevation (level of arm elevation, amplitude) as well as duration of arm elevation, especially > 90°.

conclusionWe conclude on a limited evidence for an association between arm elevation at work and shoulder disorders. Severe arm elevation with elbows above shoulder level (i.e., > 90°) shows a moderate evidence for an association with shoulder disorders.

Indexed as

ShoulderErgonomicsHumansOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposurePostureRisk FactorsShoulder PainArm elevationShoulder painSystematic reviewWork-related musculoskeletal disorders

Identifiers

PMID32572582
PMCPMC7519900
OpenAlexW3036473426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.