Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32572572›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2021

Emotional SNARC: emotional faces affect the impact of number magnitude on gaze patterns.

Ivan Blanco, Ines Nieto, Carmelo Vazquez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ivan BlancoDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3611-5814
Ines NietoDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8902-3791
Carmelo VazquezDepartment of Clinical Psychology, School of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223, Madrid, Spain. cvazquez@psi.ucm.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1796-2161

Funding

Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España PSI2014-61764 (EXPLORA), PSI2014-56303-REDT, PSI2015-69253-RMinisterio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte BES-2013-064936Universidad Complutense de Madrid CT17/17-CT18/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect is characterised by a spatial cognitive representation of low numbers to the left side of space and high numbers to the right side of space. This effect has been found using a diversity of stimuli and experimental paradigms. However, the influence of emotional stimuli on this effect remains unclear. In this study, the SNARC effect is analysed in relation to pairs of emotional facial stimuli (happy-neutral, sad-neutral and happy-sad pairs). Gaze patterns of 151 participants were analysed when exposed to a free-viewing eye-tracking paradigm consisting of pairs of emotional faces preceded by small and large numbers. Replicating previous results, a standard SNARC effect was found independently of the emotional expressions of the faces (i.e., there was a significant linear trend of number magnitude in the frequency of first fixations of the gaze to the left side space). However, specific slope analyses revealed that the SNARC effect was influenced by the spatial position of each emotion presented in the emotional pairs. Specifically, the effect disappeared in happy-neutral trials, when the happy faces were allocated in the right position and also in happy-sad trials when two emotional stimuli were simultaneously displayed. The study revealed that the SNARC effect is sensitive to the spatial position of emotional stimuli which further adds to other known limits of the phenomenon. The limitations of the study and its implications in the area of cognition and emotion are also discussed.

Indexed as

EmotionsHappinessCognitionHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.