Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32572556›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2021

What you need to know: updates in penile cancer staging.

Mahmoud I Khalil, Mohamed H Kamel, Jasreman Dhillon, Viraj Master, Rodney Davis, Ali J Hajiran, Philippe E Spiess

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. MR imaging of penile pathology and prostheses.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparing T2-T3 staging of penile cancer according to the American Joint Committee on cancer 8Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mahmoud I KhalilDepartment of Urology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, AR, USA.
Mohamed H KamelDepartment of Urology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, AR, USA.
Jasreman DhillonDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Viraj MasterDepartment of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rodney DavisDepartment of Urology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, AR, USA.
Ali J HajiranDepartment of Genito-Urinary Oncology and Tumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Philippe E SpiessDepartment of Genito-Urinary Oncology and Tumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. Philippe.Spiess@moffitt.org.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USEmory University · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe sought to discuss the updates in the 8th edition (8E) of The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging for penile cancer and to provide relevant evidence associated with the major changes that occurred.

methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed

resultsModifications were observed in the tumor and nodal staging. In the 8E AJCC, Ta disease indicates noninvasive localized squamous cell carcinoma, which allows for inclusion of other historical variants. T1 is subcategorized into T1a and T1b according to existence of lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion and high-grade tumor. This subcategorization demonstrates different risks for lymph node (LN) metastases and will affect decision strategy when opting for inguinal lymphadenectomy. Urethral invasion is no longer a differentiator between T2 and T3 disease, as T2 includes invasion of the corpus spongiosum and T3 involves invasion of the corpus cavernosum. For nodal staging, pN1 has been increased from a single LN metastases to two unilateral inguinal LN metastases, while pN2 has been modified to three or more inguinal LN metastases. This change was evidenced by demonstrating no significant difference in disease specific mortality between the previous edition's pN1 and pN2.

conclusionsThe 8E penile cancer staging provides several modifications that have relevant clinical implications in the management of penile cancer. Nevertheless, it requires refinements that allow for better staging of penile tumors.

Indexed as

HumansMaleNeoplasm StagingPenile NeoplasmsAJCCNodal stagePenile cancerTNM stagingUpdate

Identifiers

PMID32572556
OpenAlexW3036848529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.