Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32572463›Full record

ArticleChemical senses2020

Genetic Deletion of TrpV1 and TrpA1 Does Not Alter Avoidance of or Patterns of Brainstem Activation to Citric Acid in Mice.

Tian Yu, Courtney E Wilson, Jennifer M Stratford, Thomas E Finger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical senses, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Taste dysfunction in Long COVID.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Chemosensory tobacco product toxicology part 2: toxicological testing, assays, and state of the science.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. The role of GABA in modulation of taste signaling within the taste bud.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2024
    Article
  5. The Cellular and Molecular Basis of Sour Taste.Annual review of physiology · 2022
    Review
  6. The Role of ATP and Purinergic Receptors in Taste Signaling.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  7. Sour taste: receptors, cells and circuits.Current opinion in physiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tian YuRocky Mountain Taste & Smell Center, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Courtney E WilsonRocky Mountain Taste & Smell Center, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jennifer M StratfordRocky Mountain Taste & Smell Center, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Thomas E FingerRocky Mountain Taste & Smell Center, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Rocky Mountain MS Center · US

Funding

MULTIPLE GUSTATORY REFLEX SYSTEMS IN THE BRAINSTEMR01DC000147 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI FINGER, THOMAS E · 1989 to 2007
$2.1M
The Neurobiology of Sour TasteR01DC012931 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI FINGER, THOMAS E · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000147NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure of the oral cavity to acidic solutions evokes not only a sensation of sour, but also of sharp or tangy. Acidic substances potentially stimulate both taste buds and acid-sensitive mucosal free nerve endings. Mice lacking taste function (P2X2/P2X3 double-KO mice) refuse acidic solutions similar to wildtype (WT) mice and intraoral infusion of acidic solutions in these KO animals evokes substantial c-Fos activity within orosensory trigeminal nuclei as well as of the nucleus of the solitary tract (nTS) (Stratford, Thompson, et al. 2017). This residual acid-evoked, non-taste activity includes areas that receive inputs from trigeminal and glossopharyngeal peptidergic (CGRP-containing) nerve fibers that express TrpA1 and TrpV1 both of which are activated by low pH. We compared avoidance responses in WT and TrpA1/V1 double-KO (TRPA1/V1Dbl-/-) mice in brief-access behavioral assay (lickometer) to 1, 3, 10, and 30 mM citric acid, along with 100 µM SC45647 and H2O. Both WT and TRPA1/V1Dbl-/- show similar avoidance, including to higher concentrations of citric acid (10 and 30 mM; pH 2.62 and pH 2.36, respectively), indicating that neither TrpA1 nor TrpV1 is necessary for the acid-avoidance behavior in animals with an intact taste system. Similarly, induction of c-Fos in the nTS and dorsomedial spinal trigeminal nucleus was similar in the WT and TRPA1/V1Dbl-/- animals. Taken together these results suggest non-TrpV1 and non-TrpA1 receptors underlie the residual responses to acids in mice lacking taste function.

Indexed as

AnimalsAvoidance LearningCitric AcidFemaleGuanidinesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosSolitary NucleusTrigeminal NucleiTRPA1 Cation ChannelTRPV Cation ChannelsCitric AcidGuanidinesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosSC 45647TRPA1 Cation ChannelTrpa1 protein, mouseTRPV1 protein, mouseTRPV Cation Channelsc-Fosirritationsolitary nucleussourtaste budtrigeminal

Identifiers

PMID32572463
PMCPMC7545247
OpenAlexW3037193179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.