Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32572382›Full record

ArticleModeling earth systems and environment2020

Modeling the biogeochemistry of sulfur in beech (

Klaus Dolschak, Torsten W Berger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Modeling earth systems and environment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Klaus DolschakDepartment of Forest- and Soil Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Peter Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
Torsten W BergerDepartment of Forest- and Soil Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Peter Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5614-5888
Institute of Forest Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SK

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we describe the setup and the application of a novel Sulfur Dynamics Model (SDM), with the aim to identify and quantify processes, which are crucial for the understanding of the biogeochemical sulfur (S) cycle of forest ecosystems. The simulator takes into account abiotic processes as well as biotic interactions between atmosphere, plant and soil. We applied the model to two Austrian beech stands where deposition of S and soil solution chemistry were monitored intensively over a two-year period. Under consideration of high historic loads and the more recent recession of atmospheric S deposition, we found a suitable model configuration where it was possible to assign both intra-annual fluctuations of the SO

Indexed as

Nutrient balance modelOccult depositionSimulated annealingSO4 soil solutionSulfur biogeochemistrySulfur deposition

Identifiers

PMID32572382
PMCPMC7308167
OpenAlexW3024662560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.