Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32572221›Full record

ReviewNature ecology & evolution2020

Microbial transmission in animal social networks and the social microbiome.

Amar Sarkar, Siobhán Harty, Katerina V-A Johnson, Andrew H Moeller, Elizabeth A Archie, Laura D Schell, Rachel N Carmody, Timothy H Clutton-Brock, Robin I M Dunbar, Philip W J Burnet

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature ecology & evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The island biology of the host microbiome.Trends in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Humans as an extended phenotype of their microbiota.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amar SarkarTrinity College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. amar.sarkar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6114-1873
Siobhán Harty *Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Katerina V-A Johnson *Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1159-2131
Andrew H Moeller *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Elizabeth A ArchieDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Laura D SchellDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9600-924X
Rachel N CarmodyDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7505-9646
Timothy H Clutton-BrockDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Robin I M DunbarDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Philip W J BurnetDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Biodemography of Aging in Wild ChimpanzeesR01AG049395 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI MITANI, JOHN CARY, ROSATI, ALEXANDRA G · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I006311/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J014427/1NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host-associated microbiomes play an increasingly appreciated role in animal metabolism, immunity and health. The microbes in turn depend on their host for resources and can be transmitted across the host's social network. In this Perspective, we describe how animal social interactions and networks may provide channels for microbial transmission. We propose the 'social microbiome' as the microbial metacommunity of an animal social group. We then consider the various social and environmental forces that are likely to influence the social microbiome at multiple scales, including at the individual level, within social groups, between groups, within populations and species, and finally between species. Through our comprehensive discussion of the ways in which sociobiological and ecological factors may affect microbial transmission, we outline new research directions for the field.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsSocial Networking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.