ArticleScientific reports2020
A new safety index based on intrapulse monitoring of ultra-harmonic cavitation during ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening procedures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interfacial regulation of low-intensity acoustic cavitation by MOF-based nanoparticles.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
- A new in silico model to precisely design focused ultrasound brain therapies.Medical physics · 2026Article
- From Polyphenols to Prodrugs: Bridging the Blood-Brain Barrier with Nanomedicine and Neurotherapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Focused ultrasound-microbubble treatment arrests the growth and formation of cerebral cavernous malformations.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Acoustic immune reprogramming: a novel paradigm for spatiotemporally controlled immune regulation using ultrasound-responsive nanoplatforms.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- FUS-mediated BBB opening leads to transient perfusion decrease and inflammation without acute or chronic brain lesion.Theranostics · 2024Article
- Real-Time Passive Acoustic Mapping With Enhanced Spatial Resolution in Neuronavigation-Guided Focused Ultrasound for Blood-Brain Barrier Opening.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2023Article
- The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2022Article
- Molecular Imaging of Ultrasound-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in a Mouse Orthotopic Glioblastoma Model.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Blood-brain barrier opening in a large animal model using closed-loop microbubble cavitation-based feedback control of focused ultrasound sonication.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Guiding and monitoring focused ultrasound mediated blood-brain barrier opening in rats using power Doppler imaging and passive acoustic mapping.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Nanosensitizers for sonodynamic therapy for glioblastoma multiforme: current progress and future perspectives.Military Medical Research · 2022Review
- Review
- Towards controlled drug delivery in brain tumors with microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2022Review
- The promising shadow of microbubble over medical sciences: from fighting wide scope of prevalence disease to cancer eradication.Journal of biomedical science · 2021Review
- Focused ultrasound enhances the anesthetic effects of topical lidocaine in rats.BMC anesthesiology · 2021Article
- Effect of Gambogic Acid-Loaded Porous-Lipid/PLGA Microbubbles in Combination With Ultrasound-Triggered Microbubble Destruction on Human Glioma.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Recent Advances on Ultrasound Contrast Agents for Blood-Brain Barrier Opening with Focused Ultrasound.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening using microbubbles is a promising technique for local delivery of therapeutic molecules into the brain. The real-time control of the ultrasound dose delivered through the skull is necessary as the range of pressure for efficient and safe BBB opening is very narrow. Passive cavitation detection (PCD) is a method proposed to monitor the microbubble activity during ultrasound exposure. However, there is still no consensus on a reliable safety indicator able to predict potential damage in the brain. Current approaches for the control of the beam intensity based on PCD employ a full-pulse analysis and may suffer from a lack of sensitivity and poor reaction time. To overcome these limitations, we propose an intra-pulse analysis to monitor the evolution of the frequency content during ultrasound bursts. We hypothesized that the destabilization of microbubbles exposed to a critical level of ultrasound would result in the instantaneous generation of subharmonic and ultra-harmonic components. This specific signature was exploited to define a new sensitive indicator of the safety of the ultrasound protocol. The approach was validated in vivo in rats and non-human primates using a retrospective analysis. Our results demonstrate that intra-pulse monitoring was able to exhibit a sudden appearance of ultra-harmonics during the ultrasound excitation pulse. The repeated detection of such a signature within the excitation pulse was highly correlated with the occurrence of side effects such as hemorrhage and edema. Keeping the acoustic pressure at levels where no such sign of microbubble destabilization occurred resulted in safe BBB openings, as shown by MR images and gross pathology. This new indicator should be more sensitive than conventional full-pulse analysis and can be used to distinguish between potentially harmful and safe ultrasound conditions in the brain with very short reaction time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.