Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32572050›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Aquaponics using a fish farm effluent shifts bacterial communities profile in halophytes rhizosphere and endosphere.

Vanessa Oliveira, Patrícia Martins, Bruna Marques, Daniel F R Cleary, Ana I Lillebø, Ricardo Calado

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vanessa OliveiraCESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Departament of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Patrícia MartinsECOMARE, CESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Departament of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Bruna MarquesECOMARE, CESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Departament of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Daniel F R ClearyCESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Departament of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6143-3390
Ana I LillebøECOMARE, CESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Departament of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal. lillebo@ua.pt.
Ricardo CaladoECOMARE, CESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Departament of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal. rjcalado@ua.pt.
University of Aveiro · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intensification of marine aquaculture raises multiple sustainability issues, namely the handling of nutrient-rich effluents that can adversely impact ecosystems. As integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) gains momentum, the use of halophyte plants to phytoremediate aquaculture effluents has received growing attention, particularly in aquaponics. It is, therefore, important to obtain a more in-depth knowledge of the microbial communities present in the root systems of these plants, both in their natural environment (sediment) and in aquaponics, in order to understand their nutrient removal potential. The present study used denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and barcoded pyrosequencing to assess the bacterial community present in the endosphere and rhizosphere of three halophyte plants: Halimione portulacoides, Salicornia ramosissima and Sarcocornia perennis. Species-specific effects were recorded in the profile and diversity of the bacterial communities present in halophyte roots, with significant differences also recorded for the same halophyte species grown in contrasting environments (sediment vs. aquaponics). In aquaponics the most abundant groups belonged to the orders Rhodocyclales, Campylobacterales, Rhodobacterales and Desulfobacterales, while in the natural environment (sediment) the most abundant groups belonged to the orders Rhizobiales, Sphingomonadales and Alteromonadales. An overall enrichment in bacterial taxa involved in nutrient cycling was recorded in the roots of halophytes grown in aquaponics (such as Denitromonas, Mesorhizobium, Colwellia, Dokdonella and Arcobacter), thereby highlighting their potential to reduce the nutrient loads from aquaculture effluents.

Indexed as

RhizosphereSoil MicrobiologyAnimalsAquacultureCampylobacteralesChenopodiaceaeDenaturing Gradient Gel ElectrophoresisFishesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrobiotaPlant RootsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSalt-Tolerant PlantsWaste ManagementRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID32572050
PMCPMC7308282
OpenAlexW3036598978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.