Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32572033›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

DNA double-strand breaks induce H2Ax phosphorylation domains in a contact-dependent manner.

Patrick L Collins, Caitlin Purman, Sofia I Porter, Vincent Nganga, Ankita Saini, Katharina E Hayer, Greer L Gurewitz, Barry P Sleckman, Jeffrey J Bednarski, Craig H Bassing and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Re-establishment of TAD boundary organization during DNA replication.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Patrick L CollinsDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4550-4272
Caitlin PurmanDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Sofia I PorterDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Vincent NgangaDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Ankita SainiDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Katharina E HayerDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1463-3111
Greer L GurewitzDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Barry P SleckmanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Jeffrey J BednarskiDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Craig H BassingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Eugene M OltzDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. Eugene.Oltz@osumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2513-7156

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Transcriptomics and Repertoire ProfilingP01AI106697 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Peter Alan Sims · 2013 to 2026
$31.3M
ATM FUNCTION DURING V(D)J RECOMBINATIONR01AI074953 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SLECKMAN, BARRY P · 2009 to 2023
$5.9M
Topological Control of Antigen Receptor Loci during Lymphocyte DevelopmentR01AI130231 · NIAID · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI BASSING, CRAIG H, OLTZ, EUGENE M · 2017 to 2021
$3.8M
TOPOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF DNA BREAK REPAIR IN LYMPHOCYTESR37AI118852 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Eugene M Oltz · 2021 to 2026
$2.8M
TOPOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF DNA BREAK REPAIR IN LYMPHOCYTESR01AI118852 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI OLTZ, EUGENE M · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
SEQUENCE-SPECIFIC CHROMATIN MODIFIERS; NOVEL PROTEIN THERAPEUTICS FOR B CELL LYMPHOMAR01CA188286 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI OLTZ, EUGENE M, PAYTON, JACQUELINE E. · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
INTEGRATION OF DNA DAMAGE RESPONSES WITH IMMUNE DEVELOPMENT AND FUNCTIONK08AI102946 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BEDNARSKI, JEFFREY J · 2012 to 2016
$634k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188286NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI102946NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI106697NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI074953NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118852NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130231NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI118852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) requires a coordinated DNA Damage Response (DDR), which includes phosphorylation of histone H2Ax, forming γH2Ax. This histone modification spreads beyond the DSB into neighboring chromatin, generating a DDR platform that protects against end disassociation and degradation, minimizing chromosomal rearrangements. However, mechanisms that determine the breadth and intensity of γH2Ax domains remain unclear. Here, we show that chromosomal contacts of a DSB site are the primary determinants for γH2Ax landscapes. DSBs that disrupt a topological border permit extension of γH2Ax domains into both adjacent compartments. In contrast, DSBs near a border produce highly asymmetric DDR platforms, with γH2Ax nearly absent from one broken end. Collectively, our findings lend insights into a basic DNA repair mechanism and how the precise location of a DSB may influence genome integrity.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA DamageDNA RepairAnimalsCell Line, TransformedChromatinHistonesMicePhosphorylationChromatingamma-H2AX protein, mouseHistones

Identifiers

PMID32572033
PMCPMC7308414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.