ArticleJournal of nursing measurement2020
Development, Reliability, and Validity of the Perceptions of Brain Injury Survey.
Article in Journal of nursing measurement, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building Research Capacity to Enroll Spanish-Speaking Patients and Families in a Traumatic Brain Injury Transitional Care Intervention.Western journal of nursing research · 2026Article
- Article
- The BETTER Traumatic Brain Injury Transitional Care Intervention: A Feasibility Study.Western journal of nursing research · 2023Article
- "If you respect me, you are respecting my culture": methods and recommendations for personalizing a TBI transitional care intervention.Brain injury · 2023Article
- Design, methods, and baseline characteristics of the Brain Injury Education, Training, and Therapy to Enhance Recovery (BETTER) feasibility study: a transitional care intervention for younger adult patients with traumatic brain injury and caregivers.Current medical research and opinion · 2022Article
- Veterans Health Administration nurses' training and beliefs related to care of patients with traumatic brain injury.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeThe purpose of this study was to assess psychometric properties of the Perceptions of Brain Injury Survey (PBIS), an instrument designed to assess nurses' perceptions and preparation to care for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).
methodsWe adapted two instruments to create the PBIS, and 724 nurses completed the PBIS at three hospitals.
resultsFinal instrument has 66 items and is composed of four subscales, which can be used independently. Results showed Cronbach's alpha for the overall scale was excellent (.93) and alphas for each composite subscale were acceptable to excellent (.73-.93). Findings also suggest good discriminant validity and evidence of external validity.
conclusionsThe PBIS is a reliable and valid measure for assessing nurses' perceptions of caring for patients with TBI in practice or research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.