Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32571929›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Snapping mechanics of the Venus flytrap (

Renate Sachse, Anna Westermeier, Max Mylo, Joey Nadasdi, Manfred Bischoff, Thomas Speck, Simon Poppinga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 3D printable tough hydrogel actuators.Materials horizons · 2026
    Review
  2. Plant strategies against herbivorous insects.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Programmable Multifunctional Bistable Structures for Energy Transfer and Dissipation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. The power of ionic movements in plants.The New phytologist · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Snapping for 4D-Printed Insect-Scale Metal-Jumper.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Renate SachseInstitute for Structural Mechanics, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany; sachse@ibb.uni-stuttgart.de anna.westermeier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8895-9635
Anna WestermeierPlant Biomechanics Group and Botanic Garden, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; sachse@ibb.uni-stuttgart.de anna.westermeier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9281-1254
Max MyloPlant Biomechanics Group and Botanic Garden, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5744-9069
Joey NadasdiGrande Ecole MiM (Master in Management), ESSEC (École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales) Business School, 95021 Cergy-Pontoise, France.
Manfred BischoffInstitute for Structural Mechanics, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1538-4281
Thomas SpeckPlant Biomechanics Group and Botanic Garden, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2245-2636
Simon PoppingaPlant Biomechanics Group and Botanic Garden, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5341-9188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical principles for fast snapping in the iconic Venus flytrap are not yet fully understood. In this study, we obtained time-resolved strain distributions via three-dimensional digital image correlation (DIC) for the outer and inner trap-lobe surfaces throughout the closing motion. In combination with finite element models, the various possible contributions of the trap tissue layers were investigated with respect to the trap's movement behavior and the amount of strain required for snapping. Supported by in vivo experiments, we show that full trap turgescence is a mechanical-physiological prerequisite for successful (fast and geometrically correct) snapping, driven by differential tissue changes (swelling, shrinking, or no contribution). These are probably the result of the previous accumulation of internal hydrostatic pressure (prestress), which is released after trap triggering. Our research leads to an in-depth mechanical understanding of a complex plant movement incorporating various actuation principles.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationDroseraceaeModels, BiologicalMotionMovementPlant LeavesTime FactorsVideo Recordingelastic instabilityfinite element modelingplant biomechanicsplant movementsnap-buckling

Identifiers

PMID32571929
PMCPMC7355038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.